Difference between revisions of "Press"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | * 10/4/2008 The Washington Post [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/03/AR2008100303569.html "CORRECTIONS"]. | + | * 10/4/2008 The Washington Post [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/03/AR2008100303569.html "CORRECTIONS"]. An Oct. 3 Weekend article on the National Museum of Language incorrectly said "The Tale of Genji" was written between 1001 and 1020 B.C. It was written between A.D. 1001 and 1020. |
| + | |||
* 10/3/2008 The Washington Post [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/02/AR2008100201163.html "Take Our Word: It's Worth a Look"] by Amy Orndorff. | * 10/3/2008 The Washington Post [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/02/AR2008100201163.html "Take Our Word: It's Worth a Look"] by Amy Orndorff. | ||
* 9/2008 Language [http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/language/v084/84.3.falk.html "National Museum of Language open for business"] Letter to the Editor by Amelia C. Murdoch. | * 9/2008 Language [http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/language/v084/84.3.falk.html "National Museum of Language open for business"] Letter to the Editor by Amelia C. Murdoch. | ||
Revision as of 10:34, 14 October 2008
- 10/4/2008 The Washington Post "CORRECTIONS". An Oct. 3 Weekend article on the National Museum of Language incorrectly said "The Tale of Genji" was written between 1001 and 1020 B.C. It was written between A.D. 1001 and 1020.
- 10/3/2008 The Washington Post "Take Our Word: It's Worth a Look" by Amy Orndorff.
- 9/2008 Language "National Museum of Language open for business" Letter to the Editor by Amelia C. Murdoch.