2021Q3 Reports: Publication Chairs

From Admin Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Changes from last year

  • We divided the main conference proceedings into long and short paper

volumes under the concern that the proceedings pdf becomes enormous.

  • Supplementary materials other than software and dataset were

included in the final paper as appendices, capped at most four pages.

  • We stopped collecting Latex source files from authors as they are no

longer used in any way.

  • We instructed the authors to run formatchecker.py

(https://github.com/yz-joey/ACLPUB.git) before submitting the camera-ready (thanks to NAACL2021 publication chairs for developing the tool).

  • We used a spreadsheet to help with communication between publications

chairs and trouble-shooting. Workshop organisers gave feedback that this improved things for them and it was very helpful for publications chair handling workshop proceedings.

Problems

  • Many authors were confused about proper e-signature on the copyright

transfer at START (many of them just put first/last names, nicknames, START user names, etc.). It is better to elaborate on more instructions.

  • Not a small number of authors complained that they cannot change the

order of authors. Instruct authors before submission that *no* change is allowed on author information (including the order).

  • A substantial number of emails were received by the publications

chairs, approx 300 in a single week at the peak, many to make minor changes to the papers.

Recommendations

  • Instruct authors that no change is accepted after the camera-ready

submission deadline; otherwise, publication chairs need to handle many requests to fix metadata and replace pdfs.

  • Although the author instructions ask to list the addresses of the

authors' organizations, very few people follow this. It may better fit the recent habits to ask author e-mails (most people already do) rather than physical addresses.

  • Communication with publication chairs should be via a system where

requests for changes are publicly visible and authors are aware of the number of emails sent to publication chairs.

  • Have Findings chairs to handle the corresponding proceedings