Difference between revisions of "2017Q3 Minutes (public version)"

From Admin Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "ACL exec meeting (2017 summer) Sunday, July 30, 2017 Vancouver, Canada === Participants === * ACL exec: Joakim Nivre, Marti Hearst, Pushpak Bhattacharyya (Skype), Ming Zhou...")
 
Line 34: Line 34:
 
** Call for (multi-year) sponsorship from industry to support diverse students.
 
** Call for (multi-year) sponsorship from industry to support diverse students.
 
* '''Actions:'''
 
* '''Actions:'''
** We will organize annual publication of diversity statistics starting from January 2017.
+
** We will organize annual publication of diversity statistics starting from January 2018.
 
** We will communicate back to people behind the initiative to check if the current SIG model can work.
 
** We will communicate back to people behind the initiative to check if the current SIG model can work.
 
** We will check the existing rules about SIGs and find out what should be changed for a BIG.
 
** We will check the existing rules about SIGs and find out what should be changed for a BIG.

Revision as of 05:51, 16 August 2017

ACL exec meeting (2017 summer)

Sunday, July 30, 2017

Vancouver, Canada

Participants

  • ACL exec: Joakim Nivre, Marti Hearst, Pushpak Bhattacharyya (Skype), Ming Zhou, Shiqi Zhao, Graeme Hirst, Yejin Choi, Jing-Shin Chang, Jennifer Foster, Emily Bender, Walter Daelemans, Paola Merlo, and Priscilla Rasmussen.
  • AFNLP representative: Kam-Fai Wong
  • Conference organizers: (1) ACL2017: Chris Callison-Burch, Regina Barzilay, Min-Yen Kan, Anoop Sarkar; (2) ACL2018: Claire Cardie, Iryna Gurevych, Yusuke Miyao, Tim Baldwin, Karin Verspoor, Trevor Cohn
  • Kristina Toutanova, Lillian Lee (Skype)

Code of conduct

  • Points raised in the discussion:
    • Focus on narrow, practical things first.
    • Committee should discuss whether a document is needed and, if so, what its nature (guidelines or binding) and scope (narrow or broad) should be.
    • Make a survey among members about need, nature and scope.
  • Action:
    • Committee (chaired by Pushpak) will work out a proposal and present it to the Exec.

Anti-harassment procedures

  • Points raised in the discussion:
    • Set up a separate committee for anti-harassment issues.
    • Need to keep records of harassment cases.
  • Action:
    • Committee (chaired by Emily) will work out a proposal and present it to the Exec.

Promoting diversity

  • Publication of diversity statistics
    • Do diversity statistics for all conferences (which can cover 85% of all members) as well as on the ACL portal (for those who renew their membership on the portal).
    • The information of the members should be automatically imported to the portal, so that members needn’t to be asked multiple times.
  • Proposal for a diversity & inclusion BIG (Broad Interest Group)
    • Be supportive of creating a BIG.
    • Call for (multi-year) sponsorship from industry to support diverse students.
  • Actions:
    • We will organize annual publication of diversity statistics starting from January 2018.
    • We will communicate back to people behind the initiative to check if the current SIG model can work.
    • We will check the existing rules about SIGs and find out what should be changed for a BIG.

ACL2017 & ACL2018

  • General and local chairs 2017:
    • Childcare should be a multi-year experiment.
    • Consider extra charge for exhibitions. (The benefits of Platinum and gold sponsors now include exhibition.)
  • PC chairs 2017:
    • Should set up institutional memory about ACs and reviewers.
    • Encourage future ACL committees to consider building systematic format checker to fix the submission formatting problems.
    • Recommend to have secretarial support to the program chairs to help with operational support. It should be long-term support over multiple conferences.
    • It is better to have a mixed and more diverse program committee, with both senior and junior, male and female, well known and underrepresented.
    • ACL committee should generally consider having a longer discussion period during paper reviewing, which helps improve the review quality.
  • ACL-2018:
    • Deadlines of long and short papers: The worst agenda is putting the deadline of long papers ahead of the short papers, which may result in a lot of resubmissions of the rejected long papers.
  • Action:
    • We will initiate a discussion with PC chairs for NAACL and ACL 2018 about how to continue the work on improving paper-reviewer matching, area chair organization, institutional memory, administrative support and format checking.

Preprint publishing and paper reviewing

  • Points raised in the discussion:
    • In the short term, guidelines on preprint publishing, for both reviewers and authors, should be ready for the upcoming conferences, e.g., NAACL2018 and ACL2018.
  • Action:
    • We will appoint a working group to quickly work out guidelines and policies for the conferences in 2018 and to propose long-term strategies.

Journals

  • Actions:
    • We will move TACL to a professional publisher (MIT Press is preferred).
    • We will run an OJS server for both ACL and TACL. Ask SoftConf if they can do it.
    • We will develop an ACL-wide system for duplicate detection. Ask SoftConf to set up API or search facility.
    • We will set up search committees for new editors for both CL (1) and TACL (2) Deadline for committees to complete the work: end of 2017.

Growth of ACL in Asia

  • Action:
    • Convene a working group to discuss if ACL should create an Asian Chapter.

Regular reports

  • Points raised in the discussion:
    • SIG: We need a procedure to end a SIG if people think they no longer need it, or (better) make it dormant.
    • EACL: change the EACL conference cycle to the NAACL model, which will start from 2020.
    • NAACL: Consider the proposal to add an “Industry Track” at the NAACL conference.

Reward to the volunteers & next generation IT

  • Actions:
    • We should consider creating a service award.
    • We should recruit a pool of volunteers to do IT work.

Unethical use of the research results

  • Action:
    • Set up a website to communicate with the public about CL technology, including the “dark side”. Encourage ACL members to write the texts.