Difference between revisions of "2009Q3 Reports: Squibs and Comments"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RobertDale (talk | contribs) (New page: Book Reviews Report [Posted by Robert Dale on behalf of Graeme Hirst] Book reviews are edited by Graeme Hirst. We continue to publish one or two reviews in each issue, a smaller number...) |
GraemeHirst (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Squibs Report | |
| − | [Posted by Robert Dale | + | [Posted on behalf of Pierre Isabelle by Robert Dale] |
| − | + | At the beginning of year 2008, there were four submissions in the Squibs pipeline. In the course of year 2008, 9 additional papers were (re-) submitted. At the end of 2008, there were 2 submissions left in the pipeline. Thus, 11 decisions were made over the year. | |
| − | + | The results were as follows: | |
| + | |||
| + | * 1 paper accepted | ||
| + | * 7 papers rejected | ||
| + | * 3 invitations to revise | ||
| + | |||
| + | The mean time taken for these decisions was 75 days. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thus far, 5 papers have been (re-) submitted to the Squibs Editor in 2007. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Also, I have started to handle some book reviews on behalf of Graeme Hirst, for books published in a series he is editing for Morgan & Claypool. | ||
Latest revision as of 07:37, 8 July 2009
Squibs Report [Posted on behalf of Pierre Isabelle by Robert Dale]
At the beginning of year 2008, there were four submissions in the Squibs pipeline. In the course of year 2008, 9 additional papers were (re-) submitted. At the end of 2008, there were 2 submissions left in the pipeline. Thus, 11 decisions were made over the year.
The results were as follows:
* 1 paper accepted * 7 papers rejected * 3 invitations to revise
The mean time taken for these decisions was 75 days.
Thus far, 5 papers have been (re-) submitted to the Squibs Editor in 2007.
Also, I have started to handle some book reviews on behalf of Graeme Hirst, for books published in a series he is editing for Morgan & Claypool.