2009Q3 Reports: Squibs and Comments: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
RobertDale (talk | contribs) New page: Book Reviews Report [Posted by Robert Dale on behalf of Graeme Hirst] Book reviews are edited by Graeme Hirst. We continue to publish one or two reviews in each issue, a smaller number... |
GraemeHirst (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Squibs Report | |||
[Posted by Robert Dale | [Posted on behalf of Pierre Isabelle by Robert Dale] | ||
At the beginning of year 2008, there were four submissions in the Squibs pipeline. In the course of year 2008, 9 additional papers were (re-) submitted. At the end of 2008, there were 2 submissions left in the pipeline. Thus, 11 decisions were made over the year. | |||
The results were as follows: | |||
* 1 paper accepted | |||
* 7 papers rejected | |||
* 3 invitations to revise | |||
The mean time taken for these decisions was 75 days. | |||
Thus far, 5 papers have been (re-) submitted to the Squibs Editor in 2007. | |||
Also, I have started to handle some book reviews on behalf of Graeme Hirst, for books published in a series he is editing for Morgan & Claypool. | |||
Latest revision as of 13:37, 8 July 2009
Squibs Report [Posted on behalf of Pierre Isabelle by Robert Dale]
At the beginning of year 2008, there were four submissions in the Squibs pipeline. In the course of year 2008, 9 additional papers were (re-) submitted. At the end of 2008, there were 2 submissions left in the pipeline. Thus, 11 decisions were made over the year.
The results were as follows:
* 1 paper accepted * 7 papers rejected * 3 invitations to revise
The mean time taken for these decisions was 75 days.
Thus far, 5 papers have been (re-) submitted to the Squibs Editor in 2007.
Also, I have started to handle some book reviews on behalf of Graeme Hirst, for books published in a series he is editing for Morgan & Claypool.