Difference between revisions of "CL Journal COI Policy"

From Admin Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "In all cases of identified review COIs for the EiC, it is best practice for the alternate decision-maker to anonymize any conflicted parties (e.g., reviewers, editors) as to w...")
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 03:28, 19 December 2021

In all cases of identified review COIs for the EiC, it is best practice for the alternate decision-maker to anonymize any conflicted parties (e.g., reviewers, editors) as to who has assumed their roles. The EiC will designate a CL Action Editor to appoint another CL Action Editor to the decision-making role. Using this process, the third person remains anonymous from all conflicted parties. To preserve anonymity, the review process will be conducted outside the CL review system.