<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.aclweb.org/adminwiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=2016Q3_Reports%3A_CL_Journal_Editor</id>
	<title>2016Q3 Reports: CL Journal Editor - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.aclweb.org/adminwiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=2016Q3_Reports%3A_CL_Journal_Editor"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.aclweb.org/adminwiki/index.php?title=2016Q3_Reports:_CL_Journal_Editor&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-31T04:14:33Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.aclweb.org/adminwiki/index.php?title=2016Q3_Reports:_CL_Journal_Editor&amp;diff=71289&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>JingShinChang: Created page with &quot;Computational Linguistics 2016Q3 report  In this  report I document,  for a change,  two kinds of  statistics I have not usually discussed: impact factors and gender statistic...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.aclweb.org/adminwiki/index.php?title=2016Q3_Reports:_CL_Journal_Editor&amp;diff=71289&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2016-07-24T02:39:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Computational Linguistics 2016Q3 report  In this  report I document,  for a change,  two kinds of  statistics I have not usually discussed: impact factors and gender statistic...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Computational Linguistics 2016Q3 report&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this  report I document,  for a change,  two kinds of  statistics I&lt;br /&gt;
have not usually discussed: impact factors and gender statistics.  All&lt;br /&gt;
other statistics  (number of  papers submitted,  average time  to fist&lt;br /&gt;
decision, etc,  are roughly the same as first quarter report)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Computational Linguistics Impact factor ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The  JCR  2015   impact  factors  have  been  released   in  June  and&lt;br /&gt;
Computational  Linguistics had  a very  good year.  The journal  had a&lt;br /&gt;
2.017 score which made it:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* 8th out of 179 journals in Linguistics &lt;br /&gt;
* 38th out of 130 journals in computer science, artificial intelligence &lt;br /&gt;
* 30th out of 104 journals in computer science, interdisciplinary applications &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Going open access hasn&amp;#039;t impacted the journal&amp;#039;s ability to attract top&lt;br /&gt;
quality  papers  and  fluctuations   in  impact  factors that   we  have&lt;br /&gt;
witnessed recently are normal. This was Computational Linguistics best&lt;br /&gt;
year in quite some time.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Impact factors in recent past year&lt;br /&gt;
* 2011  0.721&lt;br /&gt;
* 2012  0.940&lt;br /&gt;
* 2013  1.468&lt;br /&gt;
* 2014  1.224&lt;br /&gt;
* 2015  2.017&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Computational Linguistics Gender Statistics 2015 ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
We have been  asked by the LSA (the Linguistic  Society of America) to&lt;br /&gt;
compile gender statistics, as part  of a much larger effort concerning&lt;br /&gt;
all linguistics  journals. These  are the statistics  we were  able to&lt;br /&gt;
gather in a reasonable amount of  time for paers submitted in 2015 for&lt;br /&gt;
which a decision has been reached.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== INFORMATION REQUESTED: ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Associate Editors&lt;br /&gt;
* Number of guest editors 2 (males 0, females 2)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Editorial Board 2015&lt;br /&gt;
* Number of editorial board members 24 (males 16, females 8)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Editorial Board 2014&lt;br /&gt;
* Number of editorial board members 24 (males 18, females 6)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Editorial Board 2013&lt;br /&gt;
* Number of editorial board members 24 (males 16, females 8)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Manuscripts == &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For co-authored papers, each author has been tallied. These numbers include a special issue&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Number of paper submitted for review in total 129.&lt;br /&gt;
Number of suitable papers submitted for review 53: male authors 84, female authors 36, unknown 18.&lt;br /&gt;
Number of suitable papers accepted 19: male authors 35, female authors 17, unknown 4.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
First author information for those papers that were accepted:&lt;br /&gt;
* male first authors 13, female first authors 5, unknown 1.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In compiling these  statistics, I was intrigued by the  fact that most&lt;br /&gt;
(suitable) submitted papers are single gender (either all males or all&lt;br /&gt;
female).  Here are the statistics  for the papers submitted (including&lt;br /&gt;
special issue): female only 6, male only 26, mixed 15, other 5.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JingShinChang</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>