<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.aclweb.org/adminwiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=2013Q3_Reports%3A_CL_Journal_Editor</id>
	<title>2013Q3 Reports: CL Journal Editor - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.aclweb.org/adminwiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=2013Q3_Reports%3A_CL_Journal_Editor"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.aclweb.org/adminwiki/index.php?title=2013Q3_Reports:_CL_Journal_Editor&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-28T14:51:30Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.aclweb.org/adminwiki/index.php?title=2013Q3_Reports:_CL_Journal_Editor&amp;diff=2072&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Jwherring at 11:31, 30 July 2013</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.aclweb.org/adminwiki/index.php?title=2013Q3_Reports:_CL_Journal_Editor&amp;diff=2072&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2013-07-30T11:31:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.aclweb.org/adminwiki/index.php?title=2013Q3_Reports:_CL_Journal_Editor&amp;amp;diff=2072&amp;amp;oldid=2071&quot;&gt;Show changes&lt;/a&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jwherring</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.aclweb.org/adminwiki/index.php?title=2013Q3_Reports:_CL_Journal_Editor&amp;diff=2071&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Jwherring: New page: 1 Highlights  Our raw submission numbers appear to keep the healthy trend of previous years, we have already received 57 new submissions and a total of 80 submissions if including resubmis...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.aclweb.org/adminwiki/index.php?title=2013Q3_Reports:_CL_Journal_Editor&amp;diff=2071&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2013-07-30T11:25:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: 1 Highlights  Our raw submission numbers appear to keep the healthy trend of previous years, we have already received 57 new submissions and a total of 80 submissions if including resubmis...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;1 Highlights&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our raw submission numbers appear to keep the healthy trend of previous&lt;br /&gt;
years, we have already received 57 new submissions and a total of 80&lt;br /&gt;
submissions if including resubmissions from the beginning of the year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As in previous years the number of thematically or qualitatively&lt;br /&gt;
unsuitable submissions is high (25 so far). As in previous years, a&lt;br /&gt;
significant proportion of the inappropriate submissions are often very&lt;br /&gt;
short (of typical conference paper length) and either outside CL&amp;#039;s&lt;br /&gt;
scope, or unaware of relevant literature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our average time to first decision for articles for the first half of 2013 is 28 days&lt;br /&gt;
overall and 72 days if excluding submissions rejected right away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2012, not including papers deemed inappropriate by the editor, this&lt;br /&gt;
time delay was 64 days.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The observed slow down in due to the change in editor, the new editor is&lt;br /&gt;
probably not entirely at full speed yet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the numbers at the end of this report for a detailed breakdown of&lt;br /&gt;
statistics regarding submissions.&lt;br /&gt;
Since the beginning of 2010, we have averaged around six long articles&lt;br /&gt;
per issue. Currently, we operate with a small number of&lt;br /&gt;
articles in reserve, which gives us some ability to combine related&lt;br /&gt;
articles in the same issue, and provides some insurance in case we have&lt;br /&gt;
a temporary drying-up of material. However, articles are published (in&lt;br /&gt;
an not-yet-proofread form) under a &amp;#039;Just Accepted&amp;#039; tab on the MIT Press&lt;br /&gt;
website as soon as they have been accepted for publication, so that they&lt;br /&gt;
are accessible prior to being formally assigned to an issue.&lt;br /&gt;
In the last two issues of 2013, however, as discussed in the winter&lt;br /&gt;
teleconference, we have had to decide to step up to eight articles per&lt;br /&gt;
issue to avoid what was perceived as an unacceptable delay of more than&lt;br /&gt;
one year from acceptance to publication of the final official version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The journal has had a dramatic and sudden drop in impact factor last&lt;br /&gt;
year, which seems to be a random effect, but that we are monitoring and&lt;br /&gt;
that I will try to investigate further.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2 Departments&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.1 Book Reviews [Report by Graeme Hirst]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Book reviews are edited by Graeme Hirst.  We publish two or three&lt;br /&gt;
reviews in each issue.  In order to avoid a conflict of interest,&lt;br /&gt;
reviews of books in the Morgan &amp;amp; Claypool series that Hirst edits are&lt;br /&gt;
coordinated by our squibs editor, Pierre Isabelle, with Hirst out of&lt;br /&gt;
the loop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.2 Squibs [Report by Pierre Isabelle]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See separate report by Pierre&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3 Administrative Matters&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.1 Editorial Handover&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Paola Merlo has officially taken over as editor-in-chief of the journal&lt;br /&gt;
in July 2013, at which point Robert Dale has stepped down after 10 years&lt;br /&gt;
as editor, although he is still invaluably useful if asked for advice.&lt;br /&gt;
Robert has done a wonderful job of running the journal all these years&lt;br /&gt;
and we are very grateful for his dedication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.2 Editorial Assistance&lt;br /&gt;
Suzy Howlett has finished her appointmeent as CL editor assistant&lt;br /&gt;
around the same time as Robert and has been overlapping with Tanja&lt;br /&gt;
Samardzic, the new editorial assistant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suzy Howlett was also invaluable in making the transition smooth and&lt;br /&gt;
overlapping with Tanja. Thank you very very much.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4 Statistics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2013 up to  19 July&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===================&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First submissions in 2013&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===================&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Survey proposal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total: 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reject (not suitable): 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Articles&lt;br /&gt;
_____________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total: 57&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Revise and resubmit: 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reject: 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reject (not suitable): 25&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No decision: 20&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Average time to decision: 28 days&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Average time to decision (excluding &amp;quot;reject (not suitable)&amp;quot;): 72 days&lt;br /&gt;
==================================&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Resubmission of an article from 2012 or before&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==================================&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surveys&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total: 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accept: 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accept with revisions: 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Articles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total: 14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accept: 6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Revise and resubmit: 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reject: 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No decision: 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==================================&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Resubmission of an article from 2013&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==================================&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Articles&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total: 5&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reject: 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No decision: 4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=========================================================&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Totals (All submissions in 2013, including survey proposals)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Total: 80&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accept: 7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accept with revisions: 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Revise and resubmit: 9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reject: 10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reject (not suitable): 26&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No review, withdrawn: 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No decision: 26&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Times for all submissions (incl. survey proposals)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Average time to decision: 34 days&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Average time to decision (excluding &amp;quot;reject (not suitable)&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;no&lt;br /&gt;
review&amp;quot;): 62 days&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Times for all article submissions&lt;br /&gt;
_______________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Average time to decision: 35 days&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Average time to decision (excluding &amp;quot;reject (not suitable)&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;no&lt;br /&gt;
review&amp;quot;): 63 days&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Country of first author (New submissions and resubmissions from 2012 or&lt;br /&gt;
before)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Articles:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Australia 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Brazil 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulgaria 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Canada 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China 9&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Czech Republic 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Egypt 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
France 4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Germany 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hong Kong 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
India 7&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Iran 3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lithuania 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Malaysia 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mexico 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Netherlands 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New Zealand 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nigeria 1&lt;br /&gt;
Palestinian Territory 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Poland 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Romania 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Singapore 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spain 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taiwan 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
UK 8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
US 13&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vietnam 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TOTAL  71&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Survey proposals:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
India 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Survey:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vietnam 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Book reviews are edited by Graeme Hirst.  We publish two or three&lt;br /&gt;
reviews in each issue.  In order to avoid a conflict of interest,&lt;br /&gt;
reviews of books in the Morgan &amp;amp; Claypool series that Hirst edits are&lt;br /&gt;
coordinated by our squibs editor, Pierre Isabelle, with Hirst out of&lt;br /&gt;
the loop.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jwherring</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>