2012Q3 Reports: Program Chairs - Revision history

MilesOsborne at 14:35, 24 June 2012

2012-06-24T14:35:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:35, 24 June 2012
Line 34:		Line 34:
	\| QA \|\|2 \|\|10 \|\|11 \|\|1 \|\|0 \|\|1 \|\|0 \|\|10 \|\|9.09% \|\|0.00% \|\|9.09%		\| QA \|\|2 \|\|10 \|\|11 \|\|1 \|\|0 \|\|1 \|\|0 \|\|10 \|\|9.09% \|\|0.00% \|\|9.09%
	\|-		\|-
	\| Social Media \|\|2 \|\|46 \|\|51 \|\|5 \|\|1 \|\|6 \|\|3 \|\|42 \|\|9.80% \|\|1.96% \|\|11.76%		\| Social Media and Sentiment\|\|2 \|\|46 \|\|51 \|\|5 \|\|1 \|\|6 \|\|3 \|\|42 \|\|9.80% \|\|1.96% \|\|11.76%
	\|-		\|-
	\| Speech \|\|1 \|\|19 \|\|16 \|\|6 \|\|0 \|\|6 \|\|0 \|\|10 \|\|37.50% \|\|0.00% \|\|37.50%		\| Speech \|\|1 \|\|19 \|\|16 \|\|6 \|\|0 \|\|6 \|\|0 \|\|10 \|\|37.50% \|\|0.00% \|\|37.50%
Line 72:		Line 72:
	\| QA \|\|2 \|\|10 \|\|10 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|10 \|\|0.00% \|\|0.00% \|\|0.00%		\| QA \|\|2 \|\|10 \|\|10 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|10 \|\|0.00% \|\|0.00% \|\|0.00%
	\|-		\|-
	\| Social Media \|\|2 \|\|46 \|\|32 \|\|3 \|\|3 \|\|6 \|\|1 \|\|25 \|\|9.38% \|\|9.38% \|\|18.75%		\| Social Media and Sentiment \|\|2 \|\|46 \|\|32 \|\|3 \|\|3 \|\|6 \|\|1 \|\|25 \|\|9.38% \|\|9.38% \|\|18.75%
	\|-		\|-
	\| Speech \|\|1 \|\|19 \|\|12 \|\|1 \|\|0 \|\|1 \|\|0 \|\|11 \|\|8.33% \|\|0.00% \|\|8.33%		\| Speech \|\|1 \|\|19 \|\|12 \|\|1 \|\|0 \|\|1 \|\|0 \|\|11 \|\|8.33% \|\|0.00% \|\|8.33%
Line 83:		Line 83:
	\|}		\|}

	There will be two awards, one for the best long paper and one for the best long paper by a student. ~~We don't have~~ the best ~~short~~ paper. The candidates for the best paper awards were nominated by the area chairs, who took into consideration the feedback they received from the reviewers on whether a paper might merit a best paper prize. The final awards were then selected by the program chairs. The recipients of the best paper awards will present their papers in a plenary session during the second day of the conference.		There will be two awards, one for the best long paper and one for the best long paper by a student. There were no obvious short papers qualifying as the best paper. The candidates for the best paper awards were nominated by the area chairs, who took into consideration the feedback they received from the reviewers on whether a paper might merit a best paper prize. The final awards were then selected by the program chairs, with help from a few extra reviewer. The recipients of the best paper awards will present their papers in a plenary session during the second day of the conference.

	We are delighted to have two distinguished invited speakers: Dr. Aravind K. Joshi (Henry Salvatori Professor, Computer and Cognitive Science University of Pennsylvania), who will give a reflection talk about the past of ACLs: "Remembrance of ACLs Past", and Dr. Mark Johnson (Professor, Language Sciences (CORE) in the Department of Computing at Macquarie University), who will give a presentation on his view of where we are heading to the future: "Computational Linguistics: Where do We Go from Here?" In addition, the recipient of the ACL Lifetime Achievement Award will present a plenary lecture during the final day of the conference.		We are delighted to have two distinguished invited speakers: Dr. Aravind K. Joshi (Henry Salvatori Professor, Computer and Cognitive Science University of Pennsylvania), who will give a reflection talk about the past of ACLs: "Remembrance of ACLs Past", and Dr. Mark Johnson (Professor, Language Sciences (CORE) in the Department of Computing at Macquarie University), who will give a presentation on his view of where we are heading to the future: "Computational Linguistics: Where do We Go from Here?" In addition, the recipient of the ACL Lifetime Achievement Award will present a plenary lecture during the final day of the conference.

			Finally, we note that especially for the short paper track many authors attempted to exploit length restrictions. For example, the space for author details was often omitted from the submitted version. ACL 13 needs to be more explicit about such exploits.

Chin-YewLin at 15:38, 23 June 2012

2012-06-23T15:38:08Z

@@ Line 83: / Line 83: @@
 |}
-There will be two awards, one for the best long paper and one for the best long paper by a
+There will be two awards, one for the best long paper and one for the best long paper by a student. We don't have the best short paper. The candidates for the best paper awards were nominated by the area chairs, who took into consideration the feedback they received from the reviewers on whether a paper might merit a best paper prize. The final awards were then selected by the program chairs. The recipients of the best paper awards will present their papers in a plenary session during the second day of the conference.
-student. We don't have the best short paper. The candidates for the best paper awards were
+We are delighted to have two distinguished invited speakers: Dr. Aravind K. Joshi (Henry Salvatori Professor, Computer and Cognitive Science University of Pennsylvania), who will give a reflection talk about the past of ACLs: "Remembrance of ACLs Past", and Dr. Mark Johnson (Professor, Language Sciences (CORE) in the Department of Computing at Macquarie University), who will give a presentation on his view of where we are heading to the future: "Computational Linguistics: Where do We Go from Here?" In addition, the recipient of the ACL Lifetime Achievement Award will present a plenary lecture during the final day of the conference.

Chin-YewLin at 15:36, 23 June 2012

2012-06-23T15:36:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:36, 23 June 2012
Line 82:		Line 82:
	\| TOTAL \|\|30 \|\|690 \|\|369 \|\|40 \|\|36 \|\|76 \|\|6 \|\|287 \|\|10.84% \|\|9.76% \|\|20.94%		\| TOTAL \|\|30 \|\|690 \|\|369 \|\|40 \|\|36 \|\|76 \|\|6 \|\|287 \|\|10.84% \|\|9.76% \|\|20.94%
	\|}		\|}

			There will be two awards, one for the best long paper and one for the best long paper by a

			student. We don't have the best short paper. The candidates for the best paper awards were

			nominated by the area chairs, who took into consideration the feedback they received from the

			reviewers on whether a paper might merit a best paper prize. The final awards
			were then selected by the program chairs. The recipients of the best paper awards will present
			their papers in a plenary session during the second day of the conference.

			We are delighted to have two distinguished invited speakers: Dr. Aravind K. Joshi (Henry

			Salvatori Professor, Computer and Cognitive Science University of Pennsylvania), who will give

			a reflection talk about the past of ACLs: "Remembrance of ACLs Past", and Dr. Mark Johnson

			(Professor, Language Sciences (CORE) in the Department of Computing at Macquarie University),

			who will give a presentation on his view of where we are heading to the future: "Computational

			Linguistics: Where do We Go from Here?" In addition, the recipient of the ACL Lifetime

			Achievement Award will present a plenary lecture during the final day of the conference.

Chin-YewLin at 15:20, 23 June 2012

2012-06-23T15:20:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:20, 23 June 2012
Line 45:		Line 45:
	\|}		\|}

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable" cellpadding="2" border="1"
	\|+ Short Paper Submission Statistics		\|+ Short Paper Submission Statistics
	\|-		\|-

Chin-YewLin at 15:19, 23 June 2012

2012-06-23T15:19:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:19, 23 June 2012
Line 80:		Line 80:
	\| Phonology/Morphology, Tagging and Chunking, Word Segmentation \|\|1 \|\|31 \|\|23 \|\|2 \|\|5 \|\|7 \|\|0 \|\|16 \|\|8.70% \|\|21.74% \|\|30.43%		\| Phonology/Morphology, Tagging and Chunking, Word Segmentation \|\|1 \|\|31 \|\|23 \|\|2 \|\|5 \|\|7 \|\|0 \|\|16 \|\|8.70% \|\|21.74% \|\|30.43%
	\|-		\|-
	TOTAL \|\|30 \|\|690 \|\|369 \|\|40 \|\|36 \|\|76 \|\|6 \|\|287 \|\|10.84% \|\|9.76% \|\|20.94%		\| TOTAL \|\|30 \|\|690 \|\|369 \|\|40 \|\|36 \|\|76 \|\|6 \|\|287 \|\|10.84% \|\|9.76% \|\|20.94%
	\|}		\|}

Chin-YewLin at 15:19, 23 June 2012

2012-06-23T15:19:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:19, 23 June 2012
Line 72:		Line 72:
	\| QA \|\|2 \|\|10 \|\|10 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|10 \|\|0.00% \|\|0.00% \|\|0.00%		\| QA \|\|2 \|\|10 \|\|10 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|10 \|\|0.00% \|\|0.00% \|\|0.00%
	\|-		\|-
	\| Social Media \|\|2 \|\|46 \|\|32 \|\|3 \|\|3 \|\|6 \|\|1 \|\|25 \|\|9.38% \|\|9.38% \|\|18.\|-		\| Social Media \|\|2 \|\|46 \|\|32 \|\|3 \|\|3 \|\|6 \|\|1 \|\|25 \|\|9.38% \|\|9.38% \|\|18.75%
	75%
	\|-		\|-
	\| Speech \|\|1 \|\|19 \|\|12 \|\|1 \|\|0 \|\|1 \|\|0 \|\|11 \|\|8.33% \|\|0.00% \|\|8.33%		\| Speech \|\|1 \|\|19 \|\|12 \|\|1 \|\|0 \|\|1 \|\|0 \|\|11 \|\|8.33% \|\|0.00% \|\|8.33%

Chin-YewLin at 15:17, 23 June 2012

2012-06-23T15:17:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:17, 23 June 2012
Line 62:		Line 62:
	\| Machine Learning \|\|2 \|\|54 \|\|28 \|\|2 \|\|3 \|\|5 \|\|0 \|\|23 \|\|7.14% \|\|10.71% \|\|17.86%		\| Machine Learning \|\|2 \|\|54 \|\|28 \|\|2 \|\|3 \|\|5 \|\|0 \|\|23 \|\|7.14% \|\|10.71% \|\|17.86%
	\|-		\|-
	MT \|\|4 \|\|86 \|\|56 \|\|4 \|\|9 \|\|13 \|\|1 \|\|42 \|\|7.14% \|\|16.07% \|\|23.21%		\| MT \|\|4 \|\|86 \|\|56 \|\|4 \|\|9 \|\|13 \|\|1 \|\|42 \|\|7.14% \|\|16.07% \|\|23.21%
	\| Multilingual \|\|2 \|\|42 \|\|15 \|\|4 \|\|0 \|\|4 \|\|0 \|\|11 \|\|26.67% \|\|0.00% \|\|26.\|-		\|-
	~~67%~~		\| Multilingual \|\|2 \|\|42 \|\|15 \|\|4 \|\|0 \|\|4 \|\|0 \|\|11 \|\|26.67% \|\|0.00% \|\|26.67%
	\| NLP Apps \|\|2 \|\|49 \|\|18 \|\|4 \|\|1 \|\|5 \|\|0 \|\|13 \|\|22.22% \|\|5.56% \|\|27.\|-		\|-
	~~78%~~		\| NLP Apps \|\|2 \|\|49 \|\|18 \|\|4 \|\|1 \|\|5 \|\|0 \|\|13 \|\|22.22% \|\|5.56% \|\|27.78%
			\|-
	\| Parsing \|\|2 \|\|66 \|\|36 \|\|9 \|\|0 \|\|9 \|\|0 \|\|27 \|\|25.00% \|\|0.00% \|\|25.00%		\| Parsing \|\|2 \|\|66 \|\|36 \|\|9 \|\|0 \|\|9 \|\|0 \|\|27 \|\|25.00% \|\|0.00% \|\|25.00%
	\|-		\|-
	\| QA \|\|2 \|\|10 \|\|10 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|10 \|\|0.00% \|\|0.00% \|\|0.00%		\| QA \|\|2 \|\|10 \|\|10 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|0 \|\|10 \|\|0.00% \|\|0.00% \|\|0.00%
			\|-
	\| Social Media \|\|2 \|\|46 \|\|32 \|\|3 \|\|3 \|\|6 \|\|1 \|\|25 \|\|9.38% \|\|9.38% \|\|18.\|-		\| Social Media \|\|2 \|\|46 \|\|32 \|\|3 \|\|3 \|\|6 \|\|1 \|\|25 \|\|9.38% \|\|9.38% \|\|18.\|-
	75%		75%

Chin-YewLin at 15:14, 23 June 2012

2012-06-23T15:14:00Z

@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 |-
 | TOTAL	||30	||690	||571	||82	||29	||111	||5	||455	||14.36%	||5.08%	||19.61%
 |}

Chin-YewLin at 15:07, 23 June 2012

2012-06-23T15:07:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:07, 23 June 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	The following table shows the number of submissions in each area for long and short papers, as well as the number of papers accepted in each area.		The following table shows the number of submissions in each area for long and short papers, as well as the number of papers accepted in each area.

	{\| class="wikitable" cellpadding="20"		{\| class="wikitable" cellpadding="2" border="1"
	\|+ Long Paper Submission Statistics		\|+ Long Paper Submission Statistics
	\|-		\|-

Chin-YewLin at 15:06, 23 June 2012

2012-06-23T15:06:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:06, 23 June 2012
Line 7:		Line 7:
	The following table shows the number of submissions in each area for long and short papers, as well as the number of papers accepted in each area.		The following table shows the number of submissions in each area for long and short papers, as well as the number of papers accepted in each area.

	{\| class="wikitable" cellpadding="~~2" align="right~~"		{\| class="wikitable" cellpadding="20"
	\|+ Long Paper Submission Statistics		\|+ Long Paper Submission Statistics
	\|-		\|-