POS Tagging (State of the art)

From ACL Wiki
Revision as of 23:39, 18 November 2009 by Linas (talk | contribs) (→‎References: bullit points for all refs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
  • Performance measure: per token accuracy
  • Training data: sections 0-18 of Wall Street Journal corpus
  • Testing data: sections 22-24 of Wall Street Journal corpus


Table of results

System name Short description Main publications Software Results
SVMTool SVM-based tagger and tagger generator Giménez and Márquez (2004) SVMTool 97.16%
Stanford Tagger learning with cyclic dependency network Toutanova et al. (2003) Stanford Tagger 97.24%
POS tagger bidirectional perceptron learning Shen et al. (2007) POS tagger 97.33%
GENiA Tagger ? Tsuruoka, et al (2005) [http://www-tsujii.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/GENIA/tagger/ GENiA 96.94% on WSJ, 98.26 on biomed.

References

See also