Difference between revisions of "POS Induction (State of the art)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Alexander Clark. 2003) |
|||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Evaluation== | ==Evaluation== | ||
| − | '''Many-to-1:''' | + | |
| + | '''Many-to-1:''' Map every induced label to a gold standard tag greedily (45 labels to 45 tags of the Penn tag set). Use the mapping to compute tag accuracy on the Wall Street Journal portion of the Penn TreeBank. | ||
| + | |||
==Results== | ==Results== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * '''Listed in order of decreasing accuracy''' | ||
| + | |||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="1" width="100%" | {| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="1" width="100%" | ||
| Line 11: | Line 16: | ||
! Software | ! Software | ||
! Many-to-1 | ! Many-to-1 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | UPOS | ||
| + | | Learning Syntactic Categories Using Paradigmatic Representations of Word Context | ||
| + | | Yatbaz et al. (2012) | ||
| + | | [https://github.com/ai-ku/upos/tree/emnlp2012 upos] | ||
| + | | 80.2% | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Brown+proto | | Brown+proto | ||
| Line 33: | Line 44: | ||
<nowiki>*</nowiki> according to Christodoulopoulos, Goldwater and Steedman (2010) | <nowiki>*</nowiki> according to Christodoulopoulos, Goldwater and Steedman (2010) | ||
| + | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
| − | * [http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D/D10/D10-1056.pdf Christos Christodoulopoulos, Sharon Goldwater and Mark Steedman. 2010. Two Decades of Unsupervised POS induction: How far have we come? In Proceedings of EMNLP 2010.] | + | * '''Listed alphabetically.''' |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N/N10/N10-1083.pdf Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Alexandre Bouchard-Cote, John DeNero, and Dan Klein. 2010. Painless Unsupervised Learning with Features. NAACL 2010.] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D/D10/D10-1056.pdf Christos Christodoulopoulos, Sharon Goldwater and Mark Steedman. 2010. Two Decades of Unsupervised POS induction: How far have we come? In Proceedings of EMNLP 2010.] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/E/E03/E03-1009.pdf Alexander Clark. 2003. Combining distributional and morphological information for part of speech induction. In Proceedings of EACL 2003, pages 59–66, Morristown, NJ, USA.] | ||
| − | + | [http://aclweb.org/anthology//D/D12/D12-1086.pdf Mehmet Ali Yatbaz, Enis Sert and Deniz Yuret. 2012. Learning Syntactic Categories Using Paradigmatic Representations of Word Context. In Proceedings of EMNLP 2012, pages 940-951.] | |
| − | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Revision as of 06:27, 23 October 2013
Evaluation
Many-to-1: Map every induced label to a gold standard tag greedily (45 labels to 45 tags of the Penn tag set). Use the mapping to compute tag accuracy on the Wall Street Journal portion of the Penn TreeBank.
Results
- Listed in order of decreasing accuracy
| System name | Short description | Main publications | Software | Many-to-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPOS | Learning Syntactic Categories Using Paradigmatic Representations of Word Context | Yatbaz et al. (2012) | upos | 80.2% |
| Brown+proto | MRF initialized with Brown prototypes | Christodoulopoulos, Goldwater and Steedman (2010) | 76.1% | |
| Logistic regression with features and LBFGS | Berg-Kirkpatrick et al. (2010) | 75.5% | ||
| Clark DMF | Distributional clustering + morphology + frequency | Clark (2003) | alexc | 71.2%* |
* according to Christodoulopoulos, Goldwater and Steedman (2010)
References
- Listed alphabetically.