Roget's Thesaurus - RTE Users: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
When not otherwise specified, the data about version, usage and evaluation of the resource have been provided by participants themselves. <br> | When not otherwise specified, the data about version, usage and evaluation of the resource have been provided by participants themselves. <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
{|class="wikitable sortable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="1 | {|class="wikitable sortable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="1" | ||
|- bgcolor="#CDCDCD" | |- bgcolor="#CDCDCD" | ||
! nowrap="nowrap"|Participants* | ! nowrap="nowrap"|Participants* | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
{|class="wikitable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin-left: 20px;" | {|class="wikitable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin-left: 20px;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! align="left"|Total: | ! align="left"|Total: 2 | ||
|} | |} | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Revision as of 15:55, 21 December 2009
When not otherwise specified, the data about version, usage and evaluation of the resource have been provided by participants themselves.
| Participants* | Campaign | Version | Specific usage description | Evaluations / Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VENSES | RTE5 | Semantic fields are used as semantic similarity matching, in all cases of non identical lemmas. Used in combination with Gardy Ward's Moby Thesaurus. | Ablation test performed. Positive impact of the two thesauri together: +2.83% accuracy on 2-way task. | |
| VENSES | RTE3 | Semantic relations between words | No evaluation of the resource | |
| New user | Participants are encouraged to contribute. |
| Total: 2 |
|---|
[*] For further information about participants, click here: RTE Challenges - Data about participants
Return to RTE Knowledge Resources