RTE5 - Ablation Tests: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
! Ablated Resource | ! Ablated Resource | ||
! Team Run | ! Team Run | ||
! Relative accuracy - 2way | ! <small>Relative accuracy - 2way</small> | ||
! Relative accuracy - 3way | ! <small>Relative accuracy - 3way</small> | ||
! Resource Usage Description | ! Resource Usage Description | ||
| Line 217: | Line 217: | ||
| style="text-align: right;"| 0.0500 | | style="text-align: right;"| 0.0500 | ||
| NE module: NERs, in order to identify Persons, Locations, Jobs, Languages, etc; Perl patterns built by us for RTE4 in order to identify numbers and dates; our own resources extracted from Wikipedia in order to identify a "distance" between one name entity from hypothesis and name entities from text | | NE module: NERs, in order to identify Persons, Locations, Jobs, Languages, etc; Perl patterns built by us for RTE4 in order to identify numbers and dates; our own resources extracted from Wikipedia in order to identify a "distance" between one name entity from hypothesis and name entities from text | ||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| AUEBNLP1.3way | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| -0.0200 | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| -0.0267 | |||
| Synonyms | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| BIU1.2way | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| 0.0250 | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| Synonyms, hyponyms (2 levels away from the original term), hyponym_instance and derivations | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| Boeing3.3way | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| 0.0400 | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| 0.0567 | |||
| | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| DFKI1.3way | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| -0.0017 | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| 0 | |||
| | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| DFKI2.3way | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| 0.0016 | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| 0.0034 | |||
| | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| DFKI3.3way | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| 0.0017 | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| 0.0017 | |||
| | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| DLSIUAES1.2way | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| 0.0083 | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| Similarity between lemmata, computed by WordNet-based metrics | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| DLSIUAES1.3way | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| -0.0050 | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| -0.0033 | |||
| Similarity between lemmata, computed by WordNet-based metrics | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| JU_CSE_TAC1.2way | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| 0.0034 | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| WordNet based Unigram match | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| PeMoZa1.2way | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| -0.0050 | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| Derivational Morphology from WordNet | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| PeMoZa1.2way | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| 0.0133 | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| Verb Entailment from Wordnet | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| PeMoZa2.2way | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| 0.0100 | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| Derivational Morphology from WordNet | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| PeMoZa2.2way | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| -0.0033 | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| Verb Entailment from Wordnet | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| QUANTA1.2way | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| -0.0017 | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| We use several relations from wordnet, such as synonyms, hyponym, hypernym et al. | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| Sagan1.3way | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| 0 | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| -0.0083 | |||
| The system is based on machine learning approach. The ablation test was obtained with 2 less features using WordNet in the training and testing steps. | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| Siel_093.3way | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| 0.0034 | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| -0.0017 | |||
| Similarity between nouns using WN tool | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| ssl1.3way | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| 0 | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| 0.0067 | |||
| WordNet Analysis | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" "align="left" | |||
| WordNet | |||
| | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| style="text-align: right;"| | |||
| | |||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 15:29, 24 November 2009
| Ablated Resource | Team Run | Relative accuracy - 2way | Relative accuracy - 3way | Resource Usage Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acronym guide | Siel_093.3way | 0 | 0 | Acronym Resolution |
| Acronym guide + UAIC_Acronym_rules |
UAIC20091.3way | 0.0017 | 0.0016 | We start from acronym-guide, but additional we use a rule that consider for expressions like Xaaaa Ybbbb Zcccc the acronym XYZ, regardless of length of text with this form. |
| DIRT | BIU1.2way | 0.0133 | Inference rules | |
| DIRT | Boeing3.3way | -0.0117 | 0 | |
| DIRT | UAIC20091.3way | 0.0017 | 0.0033 | We transform text and hypothesis with MINIPAR into dependency trees: use of DIRT relations to map verbs in T with verbs in H |
| Framenet | DLSIUAES1.2way | 0.0116 | frame-to-frame similarity metric | |
| Framenet | DLSIUAES1.3way | -0.0017 | -0.0017 | frame-to-frame similarity metric |
| Framenet | UB.dmirg3.2way | 0 | ||
| Grady Ward’s MOBY Thesaurus + Roget's Thesaurus |
VensesTeam2.2way | 0.0283 | Semantic fields are used as semantic similarity matching, in all cases of non identical lemmas | |
| MontyLingua Tool | Siel_093.3way | 0 | 0 | For the VerbOcean, the verbs have to be in the base form. We used the "MontyLingua" tool to convert the verbs into their base form |
| NEGATION_rules by UAIC | UAIC20091.3way | 0 | -0.0134 | Negation rules check in the dependency trees on verbs descending branches to see if some categories of words that change the meaning are found. |
| NER | UI_ccg1.2way | 0.0483 | Named Entity recognition/comparison | |
| PropBank | cswhu1.3way | 0.0200 | 0.0317 | syntactic and semantic parsing |
| Stanford NER | QUANTA1.2way | 0.0067 | We use Named Entity similarity as a feature | |
| Stopword list | FBKirst1.2way | 0.0150 | -0.1028 | |
| Training data from RTE1, 2, 3 | PeMoZa3.2way | 0 | ||
| Training data from RTE1, 2, 3 | PeMoZa3.2way | 0 | ||
| Training data from RTE2 | PeMoZa3.2way | 0.0066 | ||
| Training data from RTE2, 3 | PeMoZa3.2way | 0 | ||
| VerbOcean | DFKI1.3way | 0 | 0.0017 | |
| VerbOcean | DFKI2.3way | 0.0033 | 0.0050 | |
| VerbOcean | DFKI3.3way | 0.0017 | 0.0017 | |
| VerbOcean | FBKirst1.2way | -0.0016 | -0.1028 | Rules extracted from VerbOcean |
| VerbOcean | QUANTA1.2way | 0 | We use "opposite-of" relation in VerbOcean as a feature | |
| VerbOcean | Siel_093.3way | 0 | 0 | Similarity/anthonymy/unrelatedness between verbs |
| WikiPedia | BIU1.2way | -0.0100 | Lexical rules extracted from Wikipedia definition sentences, title parenthesis, redirect and hyperlink relations | |
| WikiPedia | cswhu1.3way | 0.0133 | 0.0334 | Lexical semantic rules |
| WikiPedia | FBKirst1.2way | 0.0100 | Rules extracted from WP using Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) | |
| WikiPedia | UAIC20091.3way | 0.0117 | 0.0150 | Relations between named entities |
| Wikipedia + NER's (LingPipe, GATE) + Perl patterns |
UAIC20091.3way | 0.0617 | 0.0500 | NE module: NERs, in order to identify Persons, Locations, Jobs, Languages, etc; Perl patterns built by us for RTE4 in order to identify numbers and dates; our own resources extracted from Wikipedia in order to identify a "distance" between one name entity from hypothesis and name entities from text |
| WordNet | AUEBNLP1.3way | -0.0200 | -0.0267 | Synonyms |
| WordNet | BIU1.2way | 0.0250 | Synonyms, hyponyms (2 levels away from the original term), hyponym_instance and derivations | |
| WordNet | Boeing3.3way | 0.0400 | 0.0567 | |
| WordNet | DFKI1.3way | -0.0017 | 0 | |
| WordNet | DFKI2.3way | 0.0016 | 0.0034 | |
| WordNet | DFKI3.3way | 0.0017 | 0.0017 | |
| WordNet | DLSIUAES1.2way | 0.0083 | Similarity between lemmata, computed by WordNet-based metrics | |
| WordNet | DLSIUAES1.3way | -0.0050 | -0.0033 | Similarity between lemmata, computed by WordNet-based metrics |
| WordNet | JU_CSE_TAC1.2way | 0.0034 | WordNet based Unigram match | |
| WordNet | PeMoZa1.2way | -0.0050 | Derivational Morphology from WordNet | |
| WordNet | PeMoZa1.2way | 0.0133 | Verb Entailment from Wordnet | |
| WordNet | PeMoZa2.2way | 0.0100 | Derivational Morphology from WordNet | |
| WordNet | PeMoZa2.2way | -0.0033 | Verb Entailment from Wordnet | |
| WordNet | QUANTA1.2way | -0.0017 | We use several relations from wordnet, such as synonyms, hyponym, hypernym et al. | |
| WordNet | Sagan1.3way | 0 | -0.0083 | The system is based on machine learning approach. The ablation test was obtained with 2 less features using WordNet in the training and testing steps.
|
| WordNet | Siel_093.3way | 0.0034 | -0.0017 | Similarity between nouns using WN tool |
| WordNet | ssl1.3way | 0 | 0.0067 | WordNet Analysis |
| WordNet | ||||
| WordNet | ||||
| WordNet | ||||
| WordNet | ||||
| WordNet |