DIRT Paraphrase Collection - RTE Users: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
! align="left"|Total: 4 | ! align="left"|Total: 4 | ||
|} | |} | ||
<br> | |||
Return to [[RTE Knowledge Resources]] | |||
Revision as of 08:14, 8 April 2009
| Participants | Campaign | Version | Specific usage description | Evalutations / Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boeing | RTE4 | Original DIRT db | Elaborate T sentence with DIRT-implied entailments | precision/recall in RTE4:
boeing run1: 67%/6%; boeing run2: 54%/30% |
| BIU | RTE4 | We used the canonical DIRT rulebase version of Szpektor and Dagan (RANLP 2007), and considered top 25 rules. | Verb-net + Nom-lex plus + Parc Polarity Lexicon + DIRT Paraphrase Collection = +0.9% on RTE-4 ablation tests. | |
| UAIC | RTE4 | Data taken from the RTE4 proceedings. Participants are recommended to add further information. | ||
| Uoeltg | RTE4 | Data taken from the RTE4 proceedings. Participants are recommended to add further information. | ||
| New user | Participants are encouraged to contribute. |
| Total: 4 |
|---|
Return to RTE Knowledge Resources