DIRT Paraphrase Collection - RTE Users: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
{|class="wikitable sortable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="1 | {|class="wikitable sortable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="1" | ||
|- bgcolor="#CDCDCD" | |- bgcolor="#CDCDCD" | ||
! nowrap="nowrap"|Participants* | ! nowrap="nowrap"|Participants* | ||
| Line 24: | Line 23: | ||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left" | |- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left" | ||
| | | UAIC | ||
| RTE5 | | RTE5 | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 50: | Line 49: | ||
| RTE4 | | RTE4 | ||
| | | | ||
| | | Use of DIRT relations to map verbs in T with verbs in H | ||
| | | Ablation test performed: +0.7% precision on two-way task. | ||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left" | |- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left" | ||
| Line 68: | Line 60: | ||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left" | |- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left" | ||
| | | UAIC | ||
| RTE3 | |||
| | | | ||
| Use of DIRT relations to map verbs in T with verbs in H | |||
| Ablation test performed: +0.37% precision on two-way task. | |||
|- bgcolor="#ECECEC" align="left" | |||
| UIUC | |||
| RTE3 | |||
| | | | ||
| Paired verb/argument patterns | |||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
{|class="wikitable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin-left: 20px;" | {|class="wikitable" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="margin-left: 20px;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
! align="left"|Total: | ! align="left"|Total: 9 | ||
|} | |} | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Latest revision as of 17:32, 22 December 2009
| Participants* | Campaign | Version | Specific usage description | Evaluations / Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIU | RTE5 | We used the canonical DIRT rulebase version of Szpektor and Dagan (RANLP 2007), and considered top 25 rules. | Ablation test performed. Positive impact of the resource: +1.33% accuracy on two-way task. | |
| Boeing | RTE5 | Verb paraphrases | Ablation test performed. Negative impact of the resource on two-way task: -1.17% accuracy. Null impact of the resource on three-way task. | |
| UAIC | RTE5 | Use of DIRT relations to map verbs in T with verbs in H | Ablation test performed. Positive impact of the resource: +0.17% accuracy on two-way, +0.33% on three-way task. | |
| BIU | RTE4 | We used the canonical DIRT rulebase version of Szpektor and Dagan (RANLP 2007), and considered top 25 rules. | +0.9% on RTE-4 ablation tests | |
| Boeing | RTE4 | Original DIRT db | Elaborate T sentence with DIRT-implied entailments | precision/recall in RTE4: boeing run1: 67%/6%; |
| UAIC | RTE4 | Use of DIRT relations to map verbs in T with verbs in H | Ablation test performed: +0.7% precision on two-way task. | |
| Uoeltg | RTE4 | Data taken from the RTE4 proceedings. Participants are recommended to add further information. | ||
| UAIC | RTE3 | Use of DIRT relations to map verbs in T with verbs in H | Ablation test performed: +0.37% precision on two-way task. | |
| UIUC | RTE3 | Paired verb/argument patterns |
| Total: 9 |
|---|
[*] For further information about participants, click here: RTE Challenges - Data about participants
Return to RTE Knowledge Resources