https://www.aclweb.org/aclwiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=User_talk%3AArmin 2026-06-30T19:01:30Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.43.6 https://www.aclweb.org/aclwiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Armin&diff=8602&oldid=prev 2011-01-04T18:46:17Z

<p><span class="autocomment">WSD Evaluation</span></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 18:46, 4 January 2011</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l2">Line 2:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 2:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br></td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I think your new section (Word sense disambiguation - WSD Evaluation) should be deleted. (1) There is already a link to the Wikipedia article in the existing section &quot;External links&quot; and (2) &quot;A 2010 Paper with new ideas&quot; is conspicuous self-promotion. There is no reason to treat this paper any differently from the other papers in the References section. Presumably every conference or journal paper has some new ideas, or it would be rejected in the reviewing process.--[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 18:38, 4 January 2011 (UTC)</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>I think your new section (Word sense disambiguation - WSD Evaluation) should be deleted. (1) There is already a link to the Wikipedia article in the existing section &quot;External links&quot; and (2) &quot;A 2010 Paper with new ideas&quot; is conspicuous self-promotion. There is no reason to treat this paper any differently from the other papers in the References section. Presumably every conference or journal paper has some new ideas, or it would be rejected in the reviewing process.--[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 18:38, 4 January 2011 (UTC)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">:: I reverted to the earlier version of the WSD article. You are welcome to add references to the article, but you should treat your own papers no differently from any other reference.--[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 18:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Pdturney https://www.aclweb.org/aclwiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Armin&diff=8600&oldid=prev 2011-01-04T18:38:07Z

<p>New page: == WSD Evaluation == I think your new section (Word sense disambiguation - WSD Evaluation) should be deleted. (1) There is already a link to the Wikipedia article in the existing section ...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>== WSD Evaluation ==<br /> <br /> I think your new section (Word sense disambiguation - WSD Evaluation) should be deleted. (1) There is already a link to the Wikipedia article in the existing section &quot;External links&quot; and (2) &quot;A 2010 Paper with new ideas&quot; is conspicuous self-promotion. There is no reason to treat this paper any differently from the other papers in the References section. Presumably every conference or journal paper has some new ideas, or it would be rejected in the reviewing process.--[[User:Pdturney|Pdturney]] 18:38, 4 January 2011 (UTC)</div>

Pdturney