ACL Wiki - User contributions [en]

SemEval 2012 versus 2013

2010-10-28T16:36:58Z

Tpederse: /* Votes */

== Votes ==

Increment the numbers below according to your preference.

'''For 2012:''' 1

'''For 2013:''' 3

== Reasons for 2012 ==
We still have almost 2 years! If its after 3 years, we probably won't be doing anything in the first year anyway. Hence, I vote for 2012. <br>
--
Naushad UzZaman, University of Rochester (TempEval-2 participant and TempEval-3 co-organizer)

== Reasons for 2013 ==

I understand that some participants are eager to run in yet another "competition" sooner rather than later. This is no reason to believe that squeezing the cycle into two years serves a useful purpose. My perspective is that of an organizer. A new task requires much thought and even more legwork. An old task merely repeated is not worth the bytes its data sit in. There must be new elements. To reuse the old data is easier said than done. I could share our experience with tasks 4 (2007) and 8 (2010). There was a markedly higher effort in 2009-2010 than any of us had initially thought. If the community goes with the idea of a common annotation style, well, that alone requires a deeper reflection.

I could go on, but you may already be bored. Let me just make a social observation. What we do is not a spat, a fisticuff or a race. It is a shared evaluation exercise. That many people treat is as a fight is painfully obvious. i suspect that it is not uncommon for someone to use the scores -- especially a showing close to the top -- as an argument in grant applications or requests for promotion. A stimulating intellectual challenge turns into (excusez le mot) a pissing contest. Naturally, it is better to have more chances to win that medal.

I propose to keep the usual pace. A three-year cycle has worked well. It allows organizers to do their work carefully and thoughtfully, without overstraining themselves. Those who run annual events probably survive only because innovation is very incremental.

--
Stan Szpakowicz, PhD, Professor
SITE, Computer Science, University of Ottawa

As a task organiser from 2007 (task 10) and 2010 (task 2) I concur with Stan's sentiments. It does all depend on the thought that is required for the new approach/annotation and how much time the organisers have to spare. Another argument for a longer cycle is that it gives some time for analysis of the previous data before implementing the new ideas. I do agree with Suresh and Deniz (the current SemEval co-chairs) that the decision should rest with those who are willing to organise the tasks.

--
Diana McCarthy, (co-) Director
Lexical Computing Ltd., Brighton UK

---------------------------------------------------------

As of the date of this posting (Oct 28, 2010), I would note that about 6? months has already passed since the results were submitted in the last SemEval. I think there is some argument for allowing ourselves a bit of breathing room, and also time to reflect on what happened last time before moving on to the next round.

I particularly like the idea of having a workshop of some kind about one year after the conclusion of a SemEval to allow for more detailed discussion of what happened last time around, and might help to avoid too much repetition in tasks and also provide a nice opportunity for a more in depth discussion of lessons learned. Given that, I tend to prefer a 3 year window (particularly if this enables a lessons learned style workshop after 1 year). There was, for example, an ACL 2002 workshop after Senseval-2 (2001) that focused on "Recent Successes and Future Directions" and featured some papers that did a bit more analysis of results, etc. than is normally possible right after the event. I couldn't find the call for this event, but you can see the proceedings here :

http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W02/#0800

I'd also be concerned that a 2 year window this time around might not be sustainable, and so we'd end up fluctuating a bit on the interval as the years go by. I think having it generally understood that SemEval will happen every 3 years is nice in that folks can generally plan on it. This can be helpful when working with or planning to work with students or others on a fixed time interval.

Ted Pedersen

http://www.d.umn.edu/~tpederse

task participant 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010 and task organizer 2004

------------------------------------------------------------

[[Category:SemEval Portal]]

SemEval 2012 versus 2013

2010-10-28T16:35:51Z

Tpederse: /* Reasons for 2013 */

== Votes ==

Increment the numbers below according to your preference.

'''For 2012:''' 1

'''For 2013:''' 2

== Reasons for 2012 ==
We still have almost 2 years! If its after 3 years, we probably won't be doing anything in the first year anyway. Hence, I vote for 2012. <br>
--
Naushad UzZaman, University of Rochester (TempEval-2 participant and TempEval-3 co-organizer)

== Reasons for 2013 ==

I understand that some participants are eager to run in yet another "competition" sooner rather than later. This is no reason to believe that squeezing the cycle into two years serves a useful purpose. My perspective is that of an organizer. A new task requires much thought and even more legwork. An old task merely repeated is not worth the bytes its data sit in. There must be new elements. To reuse the old data is easier said than done. I could share our experience with tasks 4 (2007) and 8 (2010). There was a markedly higher effort in 2009-2010 than any of us had initially thought. If the community goes with the idea of a common annotation style, well, that alone requires a deeper reflection.

I could go on, but you may already be bored. Let me just make a social observation. What we do is not a spat, a fisticuff or a race. It is a shared evaluation exercise. That many people treat is as a fight is painfully obvious. i suspect that it is not uncommon for someone to use the scores -- especially a showing close to the top -- as an argument in grant applications or requests for promotion. A stimulating intellectual challenge turns into (excusez le mot) a pissing contest. Naturally, it is better to have more chances to win that medal.

I propose to keep the usual pace. A three-year cycle has worked well. It allows organizers to do their work carefully and thoughtfully, without overstraining themselves. Those who run annual events probably survive only because innovation is very incremental.

--
Stan Szpakowicz, PhD, Professor
SITE, Computer Science, University of Ottawa

As a task organiser from 2007 (task 10) and 2010 (task 2) I concur with Stan's sentiments. It does all depend on the thought that is required for the new approach/annotation and how much time the organisers have to spare. Another argument for a longer cycle is that it gives some time for analysis of the previous data before implementing the new ideas. I do agree with Suresh and Deniz (the current SemEval co-chairs) that the decision should rest with those who are willing to organise the tasks.

--
Diana McCarthy, (co-) Director
Lexical Computing Ltd., Brighton UK

---------------------------------------------------------

As of the date of this posting (Oct 28, 2010), I would note that about 6? months has already passed since the results were submitted in the last SemEval. I think there is some argument for allowing ourselves a bit of breathing room, and also time to reflect on what happened last time before moving on to the next round.

I particularly like the idea of having a workshop of some kind about one year after the conclusion of a SemEval to allow for more detailed discussion of what happened last time around, and might help to avoid too much repetition in tasks and also provide a nice opportunity for a more in depth discussion of lessons learned. Given that, I tend to prefer a 3 year window (particularly if this enables a lessons learned style workshop after 1 year). There was, for example, an ACL 2002 workshop after Senseval-2 (2001) that focused on "Recent Successes and Future Directions" and featured some papers that did a bit more analysis of results, etc. than is normally possible right after the event. I couldn't find the call for this event, but you can see the proceedings here :

http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W02/#0800

I'd also be concerned that a 2 year window this time around might not be sustainable, and so we'd end up fluctuating a bit on the interval as the years go by. I think having it generally understood that SemEval will happen every 3 years is nice in that folks can generally plan on it. This can be helpful when working with or planning to work with students or others on a fixed time interval.

Ted Pedersen

http://www.d.umn.edu/~tpederse

task participant 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010 and task organizer 2004

------------------------------------------------------------

[[Category:SemEval Portal]]

SemEval 2012 versus 2013

2010-10-28T16:34:57Z

Tpederse: /* Reasons for 2013 */

== Votes ==

Increment the numbers below according to your preference.

'''For 2012:''' 1

'''For 2013:''' 2

== Reasons for 2012 ==
We still have almost 2 years! If its after 3 years, we probably won't be doing anything in the first year anyway. Hence, I vote for 2012. <br>
--
Naushad UzZaman, University of Rochester (TempEval-2 participant and TempEval-3 co-organizer)

== Reasons for 2013 ==

I understand that some participants are eager to run in yet another "competition" sooner rather than later. This is no reason to believe that squeezing the cycle into two years serves a useful purpose. My perspective is that of an organizer. A new task requires much thought and even more legwork. An old task merely repeated is not worth the bytes its data sit in. There must be new elements. To reuse the old data is easier said than done. I could share our experience with tasks 4 (2007) and 8 (2010). There was a markedly higher effort in 2009-2010 than any of us had initially thought. If the community goes with the idea of a common annotation style, well, that alone requires a deeper reflection.

I could go on, but you may already be bored. Let me just make a social observation. What we do is not a spat, a fisticuff or a race. It is a shared evaluation exercise. That many people treat is as a fight is painfully obvious. i suspect that it is not uncommon for someone to use the scores -- especially a showing close to the top -- as an argument in grant applications or requests for promotion. A stimulating intellectual challenge turns into (excusez le mot) a pissing contest. Naturally, it is better to have more chances to win that medal.

I propose to keep the usual pace. A three-year cycle has worked well. It allows organizers to do their work carefully and thoughtfully, without overstraining themselves. Those who run annual events probably survive only because innovation is very incremental.

--
Stan Szpakowicz, PhD, Professor
SITE, Computer Science, University of Ottawa

As a task organiser from 2007 (task 10) and 2010 (task 2) I concur with Stan's sentiments. It does all depend on the thought that is required for the new approach/annotation and how much time the organisers have to spare. Another argument for a longer cycle is that it gives some time for analysis of the previous data before implementing the new ideas. I do agree with Suresh and Deniz (the current SemEval co-chairs) that the decision should rest with those who are willing to organise the tasks.

--
Diana McCarthy, (co-) Director
Lexical Computing Ltd., Brighton UK

---------------------------------------------------------

As of the date of this posting (Oct 28, 2010), I would note that about 6? months has already passed since the results were submitted in the last SemEval. I think there is some argument for allowing ourselves a bit of breathing room, and also a time to reflect on what happened last time before moving on to the next round.

I particularly like the idea of having a workshop of some kind about one year after the conclusion of a SemEval to allow for more detailed discussion of what happened last time around, and might help to avoid too much repetition in tasks and also provide a nice opportunity for a more in depth discussion of lessons learned. Given that, I tend to prefer a 3 year window (particularly if this enables a lessons learned style workshop after 1 year). There was, for example, an ACL 2002 workshop after Senseval-2 (2001) that focused on "Recent Successes and Future Directions" and featured some papers that did a bit more analysis of results, etc. than is normally possible right after the event. I couldn't find the call for this event, but you can see the proceedings here :

http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W02/#0800

I'd also be concerned that a 2 year window this time around might not be sustainable, and so we'd end up fluctuating a bit on the interval as the years go by. I think having it generally understood that SemEval will happen every 3 years is nice in that folks can generally plan on it. This can be helpful when working with or planning to work with students or others on a fixed time interval.

Ted Pedersen

http://www.d.umn.edu/~tpederse

task participant 2001, 2004, 2007, 2010 and task organizer 2004

------------------------------------------------------------

[[Category:SemEval Portal]]

Conference acceptance rates

2007-08-14T19:20:42Z

Tpederse: /* ACL - Posters */

==[[ACL]] - Main session==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2003</td>
<td>360</td>
<td>71</td>
<td>20%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2004</td>
<td>348</td>
<td>88</td>
<td>25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2005</td>
<td>423</td>
<td>77</td>
<td>18%</td>
</tr>
</table>

==ACL - Student session==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1992</td>
<td>48</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>42%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1993</td>
<td>30</td>
<td>11</td>
<td>37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1994</td>
<td>41</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1995</td>
<td>48</td>
<td>19</td>
<td>24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1996</td>
<td>32</td>
<td>14</td>
<td>44%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1997</td>
<td>42</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1998</td>
<td>46</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td>30</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td>36</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td>?</td>
<td>?</td>
<td>?</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2005</td>
<td>70</td>
<td>26</td>
<td>37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>40</td>
<td>15</td>
<td>38%</td>
</tr>

</table>

==ACL - Posters==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2005</td>
<td>56</td>
<td>31</td>
<td>55%</td>
</tr>
</table>

==[[HLT-NAACL]] - Main session==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td>166</td>
<td>43</td>
<td>25.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td>110</td>
<td>31</td>
<td>28.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2003</td>
<td>162</td>
<td>37</td>
<td>22.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>257</td>
<td>62</td>
<td>24.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2007</td>
<td>298</td>
<td>72</td>
<td>24.2%</td>
</tr>
</table>

==HLT-NAACL - Student session==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</table>

==[[EMNLP]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1997</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2004</td>
<td>247</td>
<td>58</td>
<td>23.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2005</td>
<td></td>
<td>98</td>
<td>25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>234</td>
<td>73</td>
<td>31%</td>
</tr>
</table>

==[[EACL]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td> 264 </td>
<td> 52 </td>
<td>19.7%</td>
</tr>
</table>

==EACL - Student session==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2003</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>33</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>27.3%</td>
</tr>
</table>

==[[IJCNLP]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>

</table>

==[[RANLP]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</table>

==[[CICLing]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td>29</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td>72</td>
<td>41</td>
<td>57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2002</td>
<td>67</td>
<td>35</td>
<td>52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2003</td>
<td>92</td>
<td>43</td>
<td>46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2004</td>
<td>129</td>
<td>40</td>
<td>31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2005</td>
<td>151</td>
<td>53</td>
<td>35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>176</td>
<td>43</td>
<td>24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2007</td>
<td>179</td>
<td>53</td>
<td>29</td>
</tr>
</table>
* The figures are given for full papers.

==[[CONLL]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2004</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2005</td>
<td>70</td>
<td>19</td>
<td>27%</td>
</tr>
</table>

[[Category:Conferences]]

Conference acceptance rates

2007-08-14T19:17:30Z

Tpederse: /* EMNLP */

==[[ACL]] - Main session==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2003</td>
<td>360</td>
<td>71</td>
<td>20%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2004</td>
<td>348</td>
<td>88</td>
<td>25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2005</td>
<td>423</td>
<td>77</td>
<td>18%</td>
</tr>
</table>

==ACL - Student session==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1992</td>
<td>48</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>42%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1993</td>
<td>30</td>
<td>11</td>
<td>37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1994</td>
<td>41</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1995</td>
<td>48</td>
<td>19</td>
<td>24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1996</td>
<td>32</td>
<td>14</td>
<td>44%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1997</td>
<td>42</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1998</td>
<td>46</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td>30</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td>36</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td>?</td>
<td>?</td>
<td>?</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2005</td>
<td>70</td>
<td>26</td>
<td>37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>40</td>
<td>15</td>
<td>38%</td>
</tr>

</table>

==ACL - Posters==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</table>

==[[HLT-NAACL]] - Main session==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td>166</td>
<td>43</td>
<td>25.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td>110</td>
<td>31</td>
<td>28.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2003</td>
<td>162</td>
<td>37</td>
<td>22.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>257</td>
<td>62</td>
<td>24.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2007</td>
<td>298</td>
<td>72</td>
<td>24.2%</td>
</tr>
</table>

==HLT-NAACL - Student session==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</table>

==[[EMNLP]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1997</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2004</td>
<td>247</td>
<td>58</td>
<td>23.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2005</td>
<td></td>
<td>98</td>
<td>25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>234</td>
<td>73</td>
<td>31%</td>
</tr>
</table>

==[[EACL]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td> 264 </td>
<td> 52 </td>
<td>19.7%</td>
</tr>
</table>

==EACL - Student session==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2003</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>33</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>27.3%</td>
</tr>
</table>

==[[IJCNLP]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>

</table>

==[[RANLP]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</table>

==[[CICLing]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td>29</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td>72</td>
<td>41</td>
<td>57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2002</td>
<td>67</td>
<td>35</td>
<td>52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2003</td>
<td>92</td>
<td>43</td>
<td>46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2004</td>
<td>129</td>
<td>40</td>
<td>31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2005</td>
<td>151</td>
<td>53</td>
<td>35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>176</td>
<td>43</td>
<td>24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2007</td>
<td>179</td>
<td>53</td>
<td>29</td>
</tr>
</table>
* The figures are given for full papers.

==[[CONLL]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2004</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2005</td>
<td>70</td>
<td>19</td>
<td>27%</td>
</tr>
</table>

[[Category:Conferences]]

Conference acceptance rates

2007-08-14T19:16:27Z

Tpederse: /* CONLL */

==[[ACL]] - Main session==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2003</td>
<td>360</td>
<td>71</td>
<td>20%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2004</td>
<td>348</td>
<td>88</td>
<td>25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2005</td>
<td>423</td>
<td>77</td>
<td>18%</td>
</tr>
</table>

==ACL - Student session==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1992</td>
<td>48</td>
<td>20</td>
<td>42%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1993</td>
<td>30</td>
<td>11</td>
<td>37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1994</td>
<td>41</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1995</td>
<td>48</td>
<td>19</td>
<td>24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1996</td>
<td>32</td>
<td>14</td>
<td>44%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1997</td>
<td>42</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1998</td>
<td>46</td>
<td>12</td>
<td>26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td>30</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td>36</td>
<td>10</td>
<td>28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td>?</td>
<td>?</td>
<td>?</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2005</td>
<td>70</td>
<td>26</td>
<td>37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>40</td>
<td>15</td>
<td>38%</td>
</tr>

</table>

==ACL - Posters==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</table>

==[[HLT-NAACL]] - Main session==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td>166</td>
<td>43</td>
<td>25.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td>110</td>
<td>31</td>
<td>28.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2003</td>
<td>162</td>
<td>37</td>
<td>22.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>257</td>
<td>62</td>
<td>24.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2007</td>
<td>298</td>
<td>72</td>
<td>24.2%</td>
</tr>
</table>

==HLT-NAACL - Student session==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</table>

==[[EMNLP]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2004</td>
<td>247</td>
<td>58</td>
<td>23.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2005</td>
<td></td>
<td>98</td>
<td>25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>234</td>
<td>73</td>
<td>31%</td>
</tr>
</table>

==[[EACL]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td> 264 </td>
<td> 52 </td>
<td>19.7%</td>
</tr>
</table>

==EACL - Student session==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2003</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>33</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>27.3%</td>
</tr>
</table>

==[[IJCNLP]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>

</table>

==[[RANLP]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</table>

==[[CICLing]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td>29</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td>72</td>
<td>41</td>
<td>57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2002</td>
<td>67</td>
<td>35</td>
<td>52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2003</td>
<td>92</td>
<td>43</td>
<td>46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2004</td>
<td>129</td>
<td>40</td>
<td>31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2005</td>
<td>151</td>
<td>53</td>
<td>35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2006</td>
<td>176</td>
<td>43</td>
<td>24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2007</td>
<td>179</td>
<td>53</td>
<td>29</td>
</tr>
</table>
* The figures are given for full papers.

==[[CONLL]]==

<table cellspacing="1" cellpadding="1" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td>Year</td>
<td>Submitted</td>
<td>Accepted</td>
<td>Acceptance Rate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1999</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2000</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2001</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2004</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td>48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2005</td>
<td>70</td>
<td>19</td>
<td>27%</td>
</tr>
</table>

[[Category:Conferences]]

Competitions and Challenges

2007-08-14T02:41:27Z

Tpederse: /* 2007 */

The competitions and challenges below are categorized by the '''year in which they were or will be completed''', in those cases in which they begin in one year and end in a later year.

== 2008 ==


* [http://ltrc.iiit.ac.in/ner-ssea-08 NER-SSEAL 2008] - IJCNLP Workshop on NER for South and South East Asian Languages

== 2007 ==


* [http://www.nist.gov/speech/tests/ace/ace07/index.htm ACE 2007] - Automatic Content Extraction 2007
* [http://cleaneval.sigwac.org.uk/ CLEANEVAL 2007] - Cleaning pages for Web corpus creation
* [http://www.clef-campaign.org/ CLEF 2007] - Cross Language Evaluation Forum
* [http://duc.nist.gov/duc2007/call.html DUC-2007] - Document Understanding Conference (task: [[Text Summarization]])
* [http://evalita.itc.it/ EVALITA 2007] - Evaluation of NLP Tools for Italian
* [http://www.computationalmedicine.org/challenge/index.php Medical NLP Challenge] - The Computational Medicine Center's 2007 Medical Natural Language Processing Challenge
* [http://www.cis.hut.fi/morphochallenge2007/ Morpho Challenge 2007] - unsupervised segmentation of words into morphemes
* [http://www.pascal-network.org/Challenges/RTE3 RTE-3] - Third Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge ([[Recognizing Textual Entailment|RTE-3 Resources Pool]])
* [http://nlp.cs.swarthmore.edu/semeval/index.shtml SemEval-2007] - 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations
* [http://challenge.spock.com Spock Challenge] - (task: name discrimination/disambiguation in Web text)
* [http://trec.nist.gov/ TREC 2007] Text REtrieval Conference

== 2006 ==


* [http://www.clef-campaign.org/ CLEF 2006] - Cross Language Evaluation Forum
* [http://duc.nist.gov/duc2006/call.html DUC-2006] - Document Understanding Conference (task: [[Text Summarization]])
* [http://www.pascal-network.org/Challenges/RTE2/ RTE-2] - Second Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge
* [http://trec.nist.gov/ TREC 2006] Text REtrieval Conference

== 2005 ==


* [http://www.clef-campaign.org/ CLEF 2005] - Cross Language Evaluation Forum
* [http://duc.nist.gov/duc2005/call.html DUC-2005] - Document Understanding Conference (task: [[Text Summarization]])
* [http://www.cis.hut.fi/morphochallenge2005/ Morpho Challenge 2005] - unsupervised segmentation of words into morphemes
* [http://www.pascal-network.org/Challenges/RTE/ RTE-1] - Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge
* [http://trec.nist.gov/ TREC 2005] Text REtrieval Conference

== 2004 ==


* [http://www.clef-campaign.org/ CLEF 2004] - Cross Language Evaluation Forum
* [http://duc.nist.gov/duc2004/call.html DUC-2004] - Document Understanding Conference (task: [[Text Summarization]])
* [http://www.senseval.org/ Senseval 3] - evaluation exercises for [[Word Sense Disambiguation]]
* [http://trec.nist.gov/ TREC 2004] Text REtrieval Conference

== 2003 ==

* [http://duc.nist.gov/duc2003/call.html DUC-2003] - Document Understanding Conference (task: [[Text Summarization]])

== 2002 ==

* [http://duc.nist.gov/duc2002/call.html DUC-2002] - Document Understanding Conference (task: [[Text Summarization]])

Competitions and Challenges

2007-08-14T02:40:56Z

Tpederse: /* 2007 */

The competitions and challenges below are categorized by the '''year in which they were or will be completed''', in those cases in which they begin in one year and end in a later year.

== 2008 ==


* [http://ltrc.iiit.ac.in/ner-ssea-08 NER-SSEAL 2008] - IJCNLP Workshop on NER for South and South East Asian Languages

== 2007 ==


* [http://www.nist.gov/speech/tests/ace/ace07/index.htm ACE 2007] - Automatic Content Extraction 2007
* [http://cleaneval.sigwac.org.uk/ CLEANEVAL 2007] - Cleaning pages for Web corpus creation
* [http://www.clef-campaign.org/ CLEF 2007] - Cross Language Evaluation Forum
* [http://duc.nist.gov/duc2007/call.html DUC-2007] - Document Understanding Conference (task: [[Text Summarization]])
* [http://evalita.itc.it/ EVALITA 2007] - Evaluation of NLP Tools for Italian
* [http://www.computationalmedicine.org/challenge/index.php Medical NLP Challenge] - The Computational Medicine Center's 2007 Medical Natural Language Processing Challenge
* [http://www.cis.hut.fi/morphochallenge2007/ Morpho Challenge 2007] - unsupervised segmentation of words into morphemes
* [http://www.pascal-network.org/Challenges/RTE3 RTE-3] - Third Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge ([[Recognizing Textual Entailment|RTE-3 Resources Pool]])
* [http://nlp.cs.swarthmore.edu/semeval/index.shtml SemEval-2007] - 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations
* [http://challenge.spock.com] - Spock Challenge (task: name discrimination/disambiguation in Web text)
* [http://trec.nist.gov/ TREC 2007] Text REtrieval Conference

== 2006 ==


* [http://www.clef-campaign.org/ CLEF 2006] - Cross Language Evaluation Forum
* [http://duc.nist.gov/duc2006/call.html DUC-2006] - Document Understanding Conference (task: [[Text Summarization]])
* [http://www.pascal-network.org/Challenges/RTE2/ RTE-2] - Second Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge
* [http://trec.nist.gov/ TREC 2006] Text REtrieval Conference

== 2005 ==


* [http://www.clef-campaign.org/ CLEF 2005] - Cross Language Evaluation Forum
* [http://duc.nist.gov/duc2005/call.html DUC-2005] - Document Understanding Conference (task: [[Text Summarization]])
* [http://www.cis.hut.fi/morphochallenge2005/ Morpho Challenge 2005] - unsupervised segmentation of words into morphemes
* [http://www.pascal-network.org/Challenges/RTE/ RTE-1] - Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge
* [http://trec.nist.gov/ TREC 2005] Text REtrieval Conference

== 2004 ==


* [http://www.clef-campaign.org/ CLEF 2004] - Cross Language Evaluation Forum
* [http://duc.nist.gov/duc2004/call.html DUC-2004] - Document Understanding Conference (task: [[Text Summarization]])
* [http://www.senseval.org/ Senseval 3] - evaluation exercises for [[Word Sense Disambiguation]]
* [http://trec.nist.gov/ TREC 2004] Text REtrieval Conference

== 2003 ==

* [http://duc.nist.gov/duc2003/call.html DUC-2003] - Document Understanding Conference (task: [[Text Summarization]])

== 2002 ==

* [http://duc.nist.gov/duc2002/call.html DUC-2002] - Document Understanding Conference (task: [[Text Summarization]])

Conferences in 2008

2007-08-13T18:39:12Z

Tpederse: /* AAAI 2008 */

For more information, see [[Conferences and workshops]]. Please add conferences in '''chronological''' order, in the following format:


'''URL with Short Name as a heading'''
* Long Name or Description
* Location
* Dates

==IJCNLP 2008==
* International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing 2008
* website: http://www.ijcnlp2008.org
* Hyderabad, India
* January 7-12

==CICLing 2008==
* [http://www.cicling.org 9th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics]
* Haifa, Israel
* February 17-23

==ACL 2008==
* Association for Computational Linguistics 2008
* Columbus, Ohio
* June 13-20

==AAAI 2008==
* American Association for Artificial Intelligence 2008
* website: http://www.aaai.org/Conferences/AAAI/aaai08.php
* Chicago, Illinois
* July 13-17

==COLING 2008==
* 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics
* website: http://www.coling2008.org.uk
* Manchester, UK
* August 18-23

==HPSG 2008==
* International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar 2008
* Kyoto, Japan
* Dates to be determined

[[Category:Conferences]]

Uncategorized software

2007-08-13T16:56:08Z

Tpederse:

'''[[Software]] - Uncategorized and miscellaneous'''

*[http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/ai-repository/ai/areas/nlp/bookcode/allen/0.html Code from James Allen's "Natural Language Understanding" (code at CMU)]
*[http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/ai-repository/ai/areas/nlp/bookcode/nlp_pp/0.html Code from Michael Covington's "NLP for Prolog Programmers" (code at CMU)]
*[http://www.dtreg.com/ DTREG decision tree generator]
*[http://www.sics.se/ps/sicstus.html SICStus - a Prolog environment]
*[http://www.answerbus.com/index.shtml Answerbus -- Automatic Language Detection Software]
*[http://homepage.mac.com/bncweb/home.html BNCweb: A Web-Based Interface to the British National Corpus]
*[http://nlg18.csie.ntu.edu.tw:8080/opinion/index.html Chinese sentiment dictionary NTUSD]
*[http://www.athel.com/colloc.html Collocate]
*[http://lingo.stanford.edu/ CSLI LinGO Lab (Stanford)]
*[http://www.lsi.upc.es/~nlp/freeling/ FreeLing 1.1]
*[http://www.webir.org/resources.html IR and IE on the web]
*[http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~qiul/NLPTools/JavaRAP.html JavaRAP]
*[https://sourceforge.net/projects/jwordnet/ JWNL (Java WordNet Library)]
*[http://xlex.uni-muenster.de/ MTP Xlex/www]
*[http://www.langsoft.ch Natural Language Processing software]
*[http://www.dfki.de/lt/registry/draft.html Natural Language Software Registry (at DFKI)]
*[http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~francois/personality/recognizer.html Personality Recognizer from Text]
*[http://www.nzdl.org/ELKB/ Roget's Thesaurus as an Electronic Lexical Knowledge Base]
*[http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/tact/ Text Analysis Computing Tools (TACT)]
*[http://odur.let.rug.nl/~vannoord/TextCat/ TextCat]
*[http://igm.univ-mlv.fr/~unitex/ Unitex]
*[http://www.mith2.umd.edu/products/ver-mach/ Versioning Machine 2.0]
*[http://www.linguastream.org LinguaStream]
*[http://opennlp.sf.net OpenNLP]
*[http://wordnet.princeton.edu/ WordNet], English lexicon

'''Applications'''


*[http://webdeptos.uma.es/filifa/personal/amoreno/indexer/ BNC Indexer]
*[http://www.brainhat.com/ Brainhat Natural Language Processing]
*[http://www.chilibot.net/ Chilibot: NLP based miner for gene/protein/keyword relationships]
*[http://www.bultreebank.org/clark CLaRK System]
*[http://delphesintl.com/ Delphes Technologies International]
*[http://www.dtreg.com DTREG 2.0 decision trees with TreeBoost]
*[http://www.dfki.de/lt/registry/apps/korek21.html KOREKTOR 2.0 (at the DFKI NLP archive)]
*[http://www.xs4all.nl/~bsarempt/linguistics/index.html KURA 1.0]
*[http://ngram.sourceforge.net Ngram Statistics Package], identify collocations
*[http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/futrelle/bionlp/commercial/opus.html Opus, a commercial biology text mining system]
*[http://sourceforge.net/projects/pytalk/ Project: Pytalk]
*[http://www.wagsoft.com/RSTTool/ Release of RSTTool: RSTTool 2.7]
*[http://senseclusters.sourceforge.net SenseClusters], cluster similar contexts
*[http://www.softissimo.com/ SOFTISSIMO]
*[http://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/projekte/corplex/TreeTagger/DecisionTreeTagger.html TreeTagger]

'''Tools'''


*[http://www.ldc.upenn.edu/Projects/ACE/Tools/ Automatic Content Extraction (ACE): Annotation Tools]
*[http://www.norvig.com/paip/grammar.lisp a simple grammar of English]
*[http://sourceforge.net/projects/acopost/ ACOPOST]
*[http://acdc.linguateca.pt/example_alignment.html Alignment of bilingual corpora performed with EasyAlign]
*[http://www.lsi.upc.es/~lambert/software/AlignmentSet.html Alignment Set Toolkit]
*[http://www.clres.com/WordNet.html alphabetic version of WordNet 2.0]
*[http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/ Apache Lucene]
*[http://www.arabeyes.org/ Arabeyes Project]
*[http://members.aol.com/gnhbos/ocr.htm Aramedia]
*[http://www.umiacs.umd.edu/~jimmylin/downloads/index.html Aranea Question Answering System]
*[http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~jo/interarbora/ Arbora Tree Delivery Service]
*[http://misshoover.si.umich.edu/~zzheng/sentence/ Automatic English Sentence Segmentation]
*[http://www.clg.wlv.ac.uk/projects/CAST/demos.php Automatic Summarization Demos]
*[http://www.r.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~nakagawa/resource/termext/atr-e.html Automatic Term Extraction System]
*[http://lael.pucsp.br/corpora/ Bancos de dados e Ferramentas de an`alise]
*[http://www.ai.mit.edu/~murphyk/Software/BNT/bnt.html Bayes Net Toolbox for Matlab]
*[http://bndev.sourceforge.net/ Bayesian Network tools in Java (BNJ)]
*[http://sslmit.unibo.it/~baroni/bootcat.html BootCaT: Simple Utilities to Bootstrap Corpora and Terms from the Web]
*[http://callisto.mitre.org/ Callisto Annotation Tool]
*[http://www.ldc.upenn.edu/Catalog/CatalogEntry.jsp?catalogId=LDC2005T13 CCGBank]
*[http://lael.pucsp.br/corpora/alinhador/ CEPRIL aligner]
*[http://pie.usna.edu/explorec.html Chargrams Database from British National Corpus]
*[http://www.bultreebank.org/clark/index.html CLaRK System]
*[http://dlt4.mit.edu/~dr/COALS/ COALS: Correlated Occurrence Analogue to Lexical Semantics]
*[ftp://cs.nyu.edu/pub/html/comlex.html/ Comlex]
*[http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/iiip/doc/cl-http/home-page.html Common Lisp Hypermedia Server]
*[http://www.cpan.org/ Comprehensive Perl Archive Network]
*[http://clg.wlv.ac.uk/projects/CAST/ Computer Aided Summarisation Tool (CAST)]
*[http://infomap.stanford.edu/webdemo Concept Search Engine Information Mapping Demo (Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University)]
*[https://sourceforge.net/projects/concollate/ Concollate]
*[http://borel.slu.edu/crubadan/ Corpus building for minority languages]
*[http://montev.isi.edu:8000/align-tool/?CORPUS=de-news-morphix&AFILE=full-model1-50-50.gz Corpus De-News-Morphix Alignment Tool]
*[http://search.cpan.org/dist/SuffixTree/ CPAN Suffix Tree Module]
*[http://www.ucl.ac.uk/english-usage/diachronic/index.htm Creating a Parsed and Searchable Diachronic Corpus of Present-Day Spoken English]
*[http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~dbikel/software.html#wn Dan Bikel's Java WordNet Library]
*[http://www.dataharmony.com/ Data Harmony, Document Management Software]
*[http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/~lindek/demos.htm Demos of dependency database, parser, and other tools]
*[http://fuzzy.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~borgelt/dtree.html Dtree - Decision and Regression Tree Induction]
*[http://www.foreignword.com/dictionary/truespel/transpel.htm English-Truespel (USA Accent) Text Conversion Tool]
*[http://www.cs.jhu.edu/~brill/ Eric Brill's Part of Speech Tagger]
*[http://odur.let.rug.nl/~vannoord/Fsa/Manual/node1.html Finite State Automata Utilities v6]
*[http://www.jaist.ac.jp/~hieuxuan/flexcrfs/flexcrfs.html FlexCRFs: Flexible Conditional Random Fields]
*[http://garraf.epsevg.upc.es/freeling/ FreeLing 1.2]
*[http://grid.let.rug.nl/~vannoord/Fsa/fsa.html FSA6.2xx: Finite State Automata Utilities]
*[http://gate.ac.uk/ GATE (General Architecture for Text Engineering)]
*[http://www.clsp.jhu.edu/ws2005/groups/statistical/GenPar.html GenPar Toolkit for Generalized Parsing]
*[http://www.parc.xerox.com/istl/groups/nltt/medley/ Grammar Writer's Workbench for Lexical Functional Grammar]
*[http://heartofgold.dfki.de Heart of Gold - XML-based middleware for the integration of (deep and shallow) NLP components]
*[http://htk.eng.cam.ac.uk Hidden Markov Model Toolkit]
*[http://www.ida.liu.se/~nlplab/ILink/ I*Link]
*[http://www.kbsim.com/ifind.html iFind KBSim.com - Knowledge-Based Simulations, Inc.]
*[http://www.infogistics.com/posdemo.htm Infogistics: NLProcessor Interactive Demo]
*[http://www.isi.edu/~marcu/software.html ISI's version of the RSTTool]
*[http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~javabayes/Home/ JavaBayes - v0.346]
*[http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~francois/jmrc/index.html jMRC - MRC Psycholinguistic Database Java Interface]
*[http://www.comp.leeds.ac.uk/andyr/software/jTokeniser/ jTokeniser]
*[http://sourceforge.net/projects/jwordnet/ JWNL (Java WordNet Library)]
*[http://sslmit.unibo.it/%7ebaroni/welcome_to_knorpora.html Knorpora 1.0]
*[http://miniappolis.com/KWiCFinder/KWiCFinderHome.html KWiCFinder]
*[http://www.kwicfinder.com/KWiCFinder.html Kwicfinder]
*[http://odur.let.rug.nl/~vannoord/TextCat/competitors.html Language Identification Tools]
*[http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~lemur/download.html Lemur Toolkit Download]
*[http://www.lemurproject.org/ Lemur Toolkit Website]
*[http://www.leximancer.com/ Leximancer]
*[http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm/ LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines]
*[http://www.alias-i.com/lingpipe/ LingPipe]
*[http://search.cpan.org/~lgoddard/Lingua-Syllable-0.03/Syllable.pm Lingua-Syllable]
*[http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0109&L=corpora&P=R729 list of POS taggers]
*[http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/llwizard.html Log-likelihood calculator]
*[ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/lsmith/MedPost/medpost.tar.gz MedPost: A Part-of-Speech Tagger for BioMedical text]
*[http://www.lexically.net/wordsmith/version4/index.htm Mike Scott's Web - Wordsmith Tools]
*[http://mmax.eml-research.de MMAX Annotation Tool]
*[http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/research/ilash/Moby/ Moby Database]
*[http://search.cpan.org/author/SHLOMOY/Lingua-EN-Sentence-0.25/lib/Lingua/EN/Sentence.pm Module for splitting text into sentences]
*[http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~aiken/moss.html Moss: A System for Detecting Software Plagiarism]
*[http://www.clsp.jhu.edu/ws2005/groups/statistical/mtv.html Multitree Viewer (MTV)]
*[http://www.natlantech.com/lingbench_ide.html Natlanco]
*[http://www.cs.jhu.edu/~brill/code.html Natural Language Processing Systems]
*[http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/NITE/ NITE XML Toolkit]
*[http://nltk.sourceforge.net NLTK - Natural Language Toolkit]
*[http://crl.nmsu.edu/Tools/Software/ NMSU Natural Language Processing Tools]
*[http://annotation.semanticweb.org/ontomat/index.html Ontomat Homepage]
*[http://teach-computers.org/word-expert.html Open Mind]
*[http://davinci.cs.ucdavis.edu/ OpenRCT Home]
*[http://www.oriel.org/homonym.htm ORIEL -- Online Research Information Environment for the Life Sciences]
*[http://clg.wlv.ac.uk/projects/PALinkA/ PALinkA: A Resource Annotation Tool]
*[http://www.sil.org/ PC-KIMMO, Englex, PC-PATR, and PC-PARSE]
*[http://www.bluem.net/downloads/pdftotext_en/ PDF to Text]
*[http://wall.jussieu.fr/dyn/Context2 perl concordancer]
*[http://www.ai.mit.edu/~jrennie/WordNet/ Perl interface to WordNet]
*[http://www.tartarus.org/~martin/PorterStemmer/index.html Porter Stemming Algorithm]
*[http://www.sciences.univ-nantes.fr/info/perso/permanents/enguehard/recherche/CoRRecT/CoRRecT_gb.htm Project CoRRecT: Reference Corpus for the Recognition of Terms]
*[http://protege.stanford.edu/ Protege Project]
*[http://www.lingsoft.fi/cgi-pub/engcg Publically available POS tagger]
*[http://www.openchannelsoftware.org/projects/Qanda Qanda: Open source question answering system]
*[http://corpus.leeds.ac.uk/query-zh.html Query to Chinese Corpora]
*[http://www-rali.iro.umontreal.ca/Reacc/ Réacc - reaccenting software]
*[http://rdues.uce.ac.uk/acronym.shtml RDUES ACRONYM (Automatic Collocational Retrieval of NYMs) Project]
*[http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~rpnlpir/daemonCollins/ README for the daemonized version of Collins' Parser]
*[http://www.research-lab.com/ Research-lab.com]
*[http://hacks.oreilly.com/pub/h/1011 Robot Karaoke]
*[http://www.reitter-it-media.de/compling/index.html RST LaTeX (Reitter IT and Media)]
*[http://herzberg.ca.sandia.gov/jess/index.shtml Rule Engine for the Java Platform]
*[http://elib.cs.berkeley.edu/src/satz/ SATZ--Adaptive Sentence Boundary Detector]
*[http://ixa.si.ehu.es/Ixa/resources/selprefs Selectional Preferences Extracted from Semcor for WordNet 1.6 Synsets (v 1.0)]
*[http://ilk.uvt.nl/~sabine/chunklink/ Software - The chunklink script, by Sabine Buchholz]
*[http://people.csail.mit.edu/people/mcollins/code.html Software and Data Sets for Collins Natural Language Parser]
*[http://senta.di.ubi.pt Software for the Extraction of N-ary Textual Associations (SENTA)]
*[http://www-a2k.is.tokushima-u.ac.jp/member/kita/NLP/nlp_tools.html Software Tools for NLP]
*[http://sprout.dfki.de SProUT - Shallow Processing with Unification and Typed Feature Structures]
*[http://www-nlp.stanford.edu/software/lex-parser.shtml Stanford Parser]
*[http://start.csail.mit.edu/ START Natural Language Question Answering System]
*[http://www.lsi.upc.edu/%7Enlp/SVMTool/ SVMTool]
*[http://swesum.nada.kth.se/index-eng.html SweSum - Automatic Text Summarizer (with PRM)]
*[http://www.wagsoft.com/Coder/ Systemic Coder -- a Text Markup Tool (Version 4.5)]
*[http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~lenzo/t2p/ t2p: Text-to-Phoneme Converter Builder]
*[http://www.d.umn.edu/~tpederse/parallel.html Ted Pedersen - Tools for Parallel Text]
*[http://lsi.research.telcordia.com/ Telcordia Latent Semantic Indexing Demo Machine]
*[http://www.tei-c.org/Software/index.html Text Encoding Initiative --Tools]
*[http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/research/ucrel/claws/tagservice.html The CLAWS tagging service]
*[http://www.clsp.jhu.edu/ws99/projects/mt/toolkit/ The EGYPT Statistical Machine Translation Toolkit]
*[http://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/CorpusToolbox/ The IMS Corpus Toolbox Webpage]
*[http://jazzy.sourceforge.net/ The Java Open Source Spell Checker]
*[http://www.findingnames.net/ The Naming Company]
*[http://stp.ling.uu.se/~corpora/plug/pwa/ The PLUG Word Aligner - PWA]
*[http://timex2.mitre.org/taggers/timex2_taggers.html TIMEX2 Taggers]
*[http://www.coli.uni-sb.de/~thorsten/tnt/ TnT - Statistical Part-of-Speech Tagger]
*[ftp://ftp.ids-mannheim.de/kt/CSSCCb-4.0.tar.bz2 Tool for Identifying Duplicates in a Large Document Collection]
*[http://www.cs.columbia.edu/nlp/tools.html Tools developed at Columbia University (FUF, Surge, Crep, Segmenter, Verber, Xtract)]
*[http://www.torch.ch Torch3]
*[http://main.amu.edu.pl/~sipkadan/lingo.htm Turbo Lingo]
*[http://stp.ling.uu.se/cgi-bin/joerg/Uplug Uplug]
*[http://wordlist.sourceforge.net/varcon-readme VarCon (Variant Conversion Info)]
*[http://www.edict.com.hk/concordance/ Virtual Language Centre's Web Concordancer]
*[http://www.textanalysis.com/help/help.htm Visual Text - reference documentation]
*[http://www.textanalysis.com/ VisualText]
*[http://webglimpse.net/ Webglimpse]
*[http://search.cpan.org/dist/WordNet-SenseRelate Word-Net SenseRelate]
*[http://search.cpan.org/dist/WordNet-Similarity Word-Net Similarity]
*[http://sourceforge.net/projects/wordfreak Wordfreak]
*[http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/~wn/ Wordnet]
*[http://www.d.umn.edu/~tpederse/wsdshell.html WSD Shell]
*[http://www.xml-ces.org/ XCES: Corpus Encoding Standard for XML]

[[Category:Software]]

Conferences in 2008

2007-08-13T16:50:38Z

Tpederse: /* CICLing 2008 */

For more information, see [[Conferences and workshops]]. Please add conferences in '''chronological''' order, in the following format:


'''URL with Short Name as a heading'''
* Long Name or Description
* Location
* Dates

==IJCNLP 2008==
* International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing 2008
* website: http://www.ijcnlp2008.org
* Hyderabad, India
* January 7-12

==CICLing 2008==
* [http://www.cicling.org 9th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics]
* Haifa, Israel
* February 17-23

==ACL 2008==
* Association for Computational Linguistics 2008
* Columbus, Ohio
* June 13-20

==AAAI 2008==
* American Association for Artificial Intelligence 2008
* Chicago, Illinois
* July 13-17

==COLING 2008==
* 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics
* website: http://www.coling2008.org.uk
* Manchester, UK
* August 18-23

==HPSG 2008==
* International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar 2008
* Kyoto, Japan
* Dates to be determined

[[Category:Conferences]]