CL Journal COI Policy
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
In all cases of identified review COIs for the EiC, it is best practice for the alternate decision-maker to anonymize any conflicted parties (e.g., reviewers, editors) as to who has assumed their roles. The EiC will designate a CL Action Editor to appoint another CL Action Editor to the decision-making role. Using this process, the third person remains anonymous from all conflicted parties. To preserve anonymity, the review process will be conducted outside the CL review system.