Difference between revisions of "Similar-Associated-Both Test Collection (State of the art)"

From ACL Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
* the contrast between taxonomical similarity (co-hyponymy) and association (co-occurrence)
 
* the contrast between taxonomical similarity (co-hyponymy) and association (co-occurrence)
* 144 word pairs that they labeled similar-only, associated-only, or similar+associated  
+
* 144 word pairs labeled similar-only, associated-only, or similar+associated  
 
* 48 pairs in each of the three classes
 
* 48 pairs in each of the three classes
 
* test collection created by Chiarello et al. (1990)
 
* test collection created by Chiarello et al. (1990)

Revision as of 12:15, 28 June 2015

  • the contrast between taxonomical similarity (co-hyponymy) and association (co-occurrence)
  • 144 word pairs labeled similar-only, associated-only, or similar+associated
  • 48 pairs in each of the three classes
  • test collection created by Chiarello et al. (1990)
  • Chiarello et al. (1990) used the dataset in human priming experiments; they did not measure classification accuracy
  • see also: Similarity (State of the art)

Table of results

Algorithm Reference Accuracy 95% confidence
Dual-Space Turney (2012) 61.1% 52.6-69.1%
PairClass Turney (2008) 77.1% 70.1-84.3%

Notes

References

Chiarello, C., Burgess, C., Richards, L., & Pollock, A. (1990). Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemispheres: Some words do, some words don't . . . sometimes, some places. Brain and Language, 38, 75{104.

Turney, P.D. (2008). A uniform approach to analogies, synonyms, antonyms, and associations. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Coling 2008), Manchester, UK, pp. 905-912.

Turney, P.D. (2012). Domain and function: A dual-space model of semantic relations and compositions, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), 44, 533-585.